I might take Enrive down temporarily, for some months to a year if interest in it remains this low. Since 2016, there were enough lurkers that the server costs were paying for itself with ads. So even if posting was low or we had no activity, I lost nothing by keeping us online. But at this moment, there are very few people browsing the site compared to what it used to be during 2014-2017 and ads only pay for 1/3 of the costs. It has gotten expensive to continue keeping us up when we have almost no posters, and when I have become so busy with my other business that I don't think I'll be able to code Enrive for a while. While I'll miss this place, there is no justification to keep it online if people are not interested in it, and it would be a better strategy to take it offline and only bring it back online in the future when I have finished coding it, or have more spare time and money to invest in it. If you like Enrive and want to support it and would prefer to keep it online, then help make the site grow at least a little. Doubling our Online Users to an 80 average should be enough that at least it is not a monetary burden on me any longer. I know that at least one person seems to be banned from every forum out there and Enrive is his only outlet, but due to the costs I may not be able to keep us up just for 1 or 2 people posting. Not with the world in the current monetary crisis it is. If I take us offline I will do so in 2 to 3 months. Enough time to mature the idea and I don't think I want to expend more money than that when I have been doing so for a year now. And just to be clear, it's not about the money, it is about the money + little interest on the website. The money I can save for not hosting us for a year may be much better spend re-hosting us in the future when the site is fully developed and where I can also put the time to work further on it.
47 пользователей онлайн
OWL HOUSE CHADS CLAIM THIS BOARD! THIS IS NOW OWL HOUSE TERRITORY, OTHER FANDOMS BTFO
>>2429 >outlander >knows how to start an ontopic thread how? This shouldn't be possible
>>2430 is that what OT means?
>>2431 Yeah. If you don't tick the OT box you make an off topic thread. But make sure to only make off topic threads if they are SHITPOST GOLDEN quality however.
/sug/ steven universe general. Any SU fans here?
>Thread was moved to Off Topic not even /sug/ is allowed on the cartoon board, huh?
KND Revival series, Galactic Kids Next Door https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_2aDok_CcQ http://warburtonlabs.blogspot.com/2015/03/what-is-numbuh-vine-up-to.html Seems legit.
>All this hype and it was just e-begging Im not even gonna post the link to that joke of a petition, fuck you Warburton
Was there ever really so many people crying out for even more Kids Next Door? The show had a good run of like 4 seasons. More people would rather see CN bring back Megas, Samurai Jack, or Symbionic Titan. The petition doesnt even have 15k signers. Toonami had 200k but still was a hard sell and that was a lot cheaper than a whole new show
>>218 Yeah, honestly I don't think that KND was ever the most popular cartoon anyway, and it kind of started getting shitty toward the end, so I'm not surprised that the petition failed.