With Amos Yee now being back, resparking the pedo rights movement, it's about time that his thread migrated from the /newchums/ board, to the more official /pol/. During his absence, Amos seems to have gotten his life in order, changed his stance on AOC to be at the age of four rather than at the age of 0, and apologized for banning people. Here's his channel, his new name being Kino: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCokZ_ShUOz-tBqJDdsF_WoA He also gets along well with his archive channel, which is easy to find. His opponents in the comment section - mostly nazis - are of course as frothing as ever, and fun to trigger and systematically report for hatespeech.
In today's video, Amos/Kino takes on the vapid memelord Shoe0nHead, who calls pedos "snakes" and wish they'd die: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bEGqtRW4MA It's funny that she and Skeptic hate pedos, considering the age gap and their generally very abusive and unhealthy relationship. Methinks they might be projecting, just a tad...
The real gems of Amos/Kino, are in the video descriptions, so I'll cite them below (in case the videos/channel get removed): Citations showing most sexual relationships between adulst and children age around 10-16 are consensual and harmless: Condy Et Al (Archives of Sexual Behavior, VoL 16, No. 5, 1987 - Parameters of Sexual Contact of Boys with Women): https://web.archive.org/web/20180527005054/http://sci-hub.tw/10.1007/bf01541421 (Take note the mean age of the study is 12, and the methodology is assessing mostly randomly-picked college students. This is a far more credible method than anti-pedophiles citing studies supposedly ‘proving’ that underage sexual acts are harmful, with methodologies that research cases solely from people who require help in therapy clinics, that is akin to ‘proving’ Marijuana is harmful by only researching participants in a drug rehabilitation program) Arreola Et Al (Childhood Sexual Abuse and the Sociocultural Context of Sexual Risk Among Adult Latino Gay and Bisexual Men): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2865208/ (Another study indicating almost 70% of sexual acts between adults and children below 16 are consensual and harmless. Methodology of the study is interviewing adults from bars across developed states in the US (Florida, Los Angeles, New York etc.), recounting sexual acts while they were underage)
Write up indicating most pedophiles are friendly and caring individuals: https://www.b4uact.org/know-the-facts/ Stories of Underage Sexual Contact: Titus Rivas’ Book Positive Memories: https://www.ipce.info/host/rivas/positive_memories.htm#PDF Alternatively you check out this blog post by Hikari (Thoughts of a minor-attracted woman living in 201x): https://hikarisblog.wordpress.com/2018/02/16/positive-memories/
Articles on the Cognitive Development of Kids indicating a child’s ability to be able to consent to sexual acts, well below the generally considered age of consent (16-18): Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development (The 4 Stages of Cognitive Development - Background and Key Concepts of Piaget's Theory): https://www.verywellmind.com/piagets-stages-of-cognitive-development-2795457 (From age 8 and above, logical thinking has developed and children are able to think about how another person thinks and feels) A Child’s Talking Timeline (Your child's talking timeline): https://www.babycenter.com/0_your-childs-talking-timeline_10356902.bc?PageSpeed=noscript (Note that starting from Age 8, children are generally considered to be able to verbally communicate with an adult) When children understand consequences (Judy Arnall – Parenting the Digital Generation): https://judyarnall.com/2019/02/18/when-do-children-understand-consequences/ (‘Children are able to begin understanding consequences around age 6 and are much better at it around age 13’)
Kino's blog is here: https://kinodiaries.wordpress.com/ ...and if you'd like to contact him directly, this is his official email: email@example.com (Note that YouTube can often take down Gmail accounts when they take down YouTube channels, so this email may stop working if he's taken down on YouTube. Never rely on Gmail for your contact information - only use Gmail to set up YouTube channels.)
Update: He just disabled his comment section and like-dislike ratio. Both were pretty bad, as usual, but this is what Enrive is for: We'll still be able to talk freely over here. =)
(The old thread can be found here: https://enrive.org/newchums/thread/1540 )
>>7420 I'll explain what I mean with "abusive and unhealthy": In a video Shoe0nHead makes it very clear that she doesn't believe in love. She thinks that people who love are secretly abusive. She labels those people "nice guys" and to her that's a derogatory term for needy people who are just acting nice until she hurts their feelings, whereupon they get mad "for some reason". ...and so when people like pedophiles, talk about love, Shoe just freaks out and think that they're snakes. All people who love are snakes to her - not just pedophiles. What she instead classifies as a healthy relationship, is somebody who doesn't care about her, like casual rapists or molesters who force her to do things. Funny enough, this would actually be the classical pedophile stereotype. Pedos just aren't rapey enough for Shoe, and that's her actual problem with them. It's really the "I don't believe in love." part that makes Shoe mentally ill. Be into BDSM all you want, but at least be with somebody who actually cares about you.
Opponents of pedophilia are pretty stereotypical: - First you have the nazis: The guys who will just hate anything that they personally find disgusting, thinking it's the global truth. - Then you have the displacing "victims", who got violently raped by a psychopath, or just shut inside a closet by their psychopathic babysitter, and heard that this is what pedophiles do, and so now they hate pedophiles instead of psychopaths, because they're also complete idiots. - Then you have the braindead prehistorics, who just hear women not liking something, and then bashes on said thing, whatever it is. - Then you have the psychopaths, you are just jumping the bandwagon looking to get away with bashing any acceptable targets. These are the problems we're dealing with, and so once we've found the solution to these four groups, we will have the populous with us instead of against us.
Shoe0nHead made a response video. No, strike that. She made a reaction video, because that on-camera meltdown was void of any reason or arguments, and so - although she calls it "critique", and thinks she's so clever - it can't really be called a "response". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEUX3Q1a1GQ Also she was REEE-ing so hard, she grew purple hair overnight. This is what Amos Yee does to people, and this is why I love him. I think that this might be Shoe/Skeptic's first reply to Amos. They've been dodging Amos for years. They were at the free speech convention that Amos got kicked out of for no reason, and although it was a blatant display of hypocrisy, not once did they address this blatant discrimination when talking about that convention, even when called out on it, and after that they just continued to claim that free speech was the best thing ever, because "free speech for me - not for thee". That's how big frauds they are, and I'm glad that they're finally exposing themselves as the dumbasses they really are.
It gets especially cringy when she brings up LGBT rights, and just dictates that samesex couples can consent, while children cannot. This wasn't the case before the legalization of homosexuality, when gays could not consent, because they were deemed too sick to know what they were doing. ...but I'm glad that this woman has come along to tell the world who can consent and who cannot, without any reasoning to back it up. What a fucking thot.
Our hero now also has a new home on FreeSpeechTube: https://www.freespeechtube.org/user/kino (It's so far only a mirror of one video, but this is likely where you can go if he's ever taken down on YouTube again.)
At this point the nazis are getting wind of Amos being back. Cog is first out, spending the whole Amos segment of his stream advocating for his murder in various cryptic ways, calling him a "nigger" over and over, before his hysteria blooms into a nonstop song about how Amos - and totally not him - just wants attention. This guy brought up Amos because Shoe is a popular YouTuber, and so "I've been getting lots of tweets about it.", but Amos adressing Shoe, that's just not okay somehow. That's just "seeking attention". :P
Studies are like silver to these YouTube people. They can't handle it. They prod themselves up as these enlightened wise men, and then Amos Yee comes along and they immediately just melt like wax, simply because he did the homework, while all they've really got is their popular opinion. You better run, YouTubers, 'cause Amos is back, and calling you out.
>>7431 June is a whole can of worms unto herself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWnk4gkMuzw She has no business having opinions in general.
>>7432 You'd think that these LGBT people would have learned and understood what a sexuality is by now, and that it doesn't make people inherently evil, but apparently society accepting them has made them just as ignorant as anyone. A little persecution might actually be good for the soul. Blaire White is another example of a YouTuber who can't really see past his own personal preferences. To him, if you identify as an adult woman, you're an innocent person, but if you so much as identify as a little girl, then you're a predator by your very nature. Can't identify as something pure and innocent - that's just evil. The mental acrobatics they use to justify their bigotry, is fascinating: Send Blair White into a women's public restroom, and we are to expect that he won't rape any women there, but send in "the wrong type of transperson", then the impending rape is obvious. There's acceptable delusions, and then there's unacceptable delusions, and you have a delusional person trying to separate it all.
...aaand he's gone. "This account has been terminated for violating YouTube's Community Guidelines." He's still on https://www.freespeechtube.org/user/kino , though, so it's not like he's gone completely, and his old archive is still up. YouTube has lots of rules, but I can't seem to find any rules against promoting pedophilia. There's the "Any sexual content involving minors" rule, and the "Content that sexualizes rape in any form" rule, but there the context is outright pornography. YouTube goes on to state: "If your content violates this policy, we’ll remove the content and send you an email to let you know. If this is the first time you’ve posted content that violates our Community Guidelines, you’ll get a warning with no penalty to your channel. If it’s not, we’ll issue a strike against your channel. Your channel will be terminated if you receive 3 strikes." ...but apparently what YouTube states in their terms of service, is just bullshit. In reality, they'll just immediately ban channels, for whatever, without so much as a warning or a strike. This should worry other channels, but I doubt they'll think that far, when it's somebody they hate. Meanwhile they're dragging their feet on nazi terror channels that's been around for many years, claiming they might get around to them "eventually", maybe after another thousand shootings or so.
With Amos being gone from YouTube, let's feature werethless12 - the guy who reported Amos's Twitter account, and encouraged others to falsely report him on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfgnYYbaRKnxk8BEF54JT4A Feel free to tear him a new asshole if you want to exact vengeance. I bet that if YouTube support receives ten reports per video, they won't even bother to verify them.
Amos Yee fascinates me mainly because he's winning when he's losing. It doesn't matter if he's wrong or right. What matters is that suddenly people starts advocating murder, and rights and rules don't apply, because of a simple yet factually backed up opinion. There are people who claim that the holocaust never happened on YouTube, or that space isn't real, but in these cases people just shrug and go "Well, he's clearly nuts, but he's got a right to be wrong.". Not Amos Yee, though. When Amos Yee speaks, suddenly 99% of all people can't use reason anymore, and turn into these embarrassing savages from the medieval times. ...and that's typically a sign that somebody is actually RIGHT. That's "Sure, I guess you're technically right, but fuck you anyway.". That's convincing in itself, to the point where I'm just "Okay, Amos, let four-year-olds fuck, until a rational person comes along. I'm not seeing anyone really ARGUING against it.". ...and it's not only that, but the hypocrisy he calls out from large platforms like YouTube and Twitter: Can't really refer to academic papers on there, unless the subject is approved, although that's a secret not mentioned in the official rules. Sadly I'm not a wealthy man, but if I was, I'd pay all his legal fees if he'd decide to sue YouTube. Meanwhile he's also a benchmark for platforms like FreeSpeechTube, so that people know where they're safe to speak. "God bless you", Amos.
According to the archive ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sn1vZStoS2Q ) FreeSpeechTube ( https://www.freespeechtube.org/user/kino ) will be the home of all of Amos's future content. Note that if you're using the Firefox browser, this might be an issue, in the form of this error message: "No video with supported format and MIME type found." This error is in turn tied to a 403 error ((permanent) Forbidden Access) for loading the mp4 video itself. This is typically associated with not allowing cookies, which can be done on a per-site basis, starting by clicking in the "i" icon in the address bar. You might have to restart your browser for the change to take effect. (I'll do that later to see if it worked for me.)
>>7445 If you use an outdated browser such as Firefox, this video likely won't play unless you download it and rename it to a mp4 instead of a webm.. I renamed it as a webm, which open source browsers like chromium can play without a problem, unlike propriety shitty cuck tier browsers (mozilla), either way, in case the video gets taken down.. >tl;dr: Here ya go m8
Also, >https://www.freespeechtube.org Nice try FBI
>>7444 >Nazi spammer got trips Based
>>7445 I've now restarted my browser, turned on all cookies, turned off incognito mode, turned on trackers, and set the Firefox browser to just run in stardard mode. None of it worked. FreeSpeechTube just doesn't like Firefox at all. ...but I hear the owner is being contacted regarding this, so maybe things will get fixed.
>>7449 Oh, and I cleared my cookies and cache too, not that I saved the cache between sessions anyway.
I've now confirmed that the 403 forbidden errors only occurs while using the Firefox browser. Internet Explorer and Google Chrome can play the videos just fine - IE even works fine on the same computer. It's not an add-on issue, since the error persists with add-ons turned off. >>7446 "If you use an outdated browser" I'm sorry, but I can't punch you through a monitor, so you'll have to find a person on your end that can help you instead, like your mom.
Sorry for not posting more content these past days. The reason is the rather bizarre search filter on YouTube: If you type in "Amos Yee", then everything works like normal, but if you just type in "Amos", like I did, then all of those hits for Amos Yee, are removed. The dumbasses censored "Amos" but not "Amos Yee".
Next up is Irate Alex: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljt_jeih1I4 The hysterical clapping segment aside, this guy isn't as much of a sperg as June and Cog are. He also makes it clear that pedos who don't touch children, are okay, but should probably be put on a watchlist. His issue is mainly with the consent. Alex opens up with the unfounded assumption that almost all children are harmed by sex at young ages, and is against even teens having sex for this reason, especially with adults. He claims - quote - that "there is overwhelming evidence", and promises to cite sources later. Maybe he should have opened up with that, since the myth that sex causes harm, is so prevalent, and yet science has only so far determined that sex at young ages will help in child development. From this Alex deduces that advocacy for pedophilia is advocating for harm, and so freedom of speech shouldn't apply to it. He lasts to 14:00 in the video, before the sperging starts. While hitting himself off camera, he shouts that a child needs to be eight to understand abstract concepts. He doesn't cite any source. Irate Alex does get a bit more serious eventually - to be continued.
Alex then brings up Andy Warski, basically stating that correlation is causation: That Andy would have grown up to become a productive member of society, if he hadn't been "molested" as a child. I call bullshit on that, since Warski's mental problems indicate such severe brain damage that sexual touches alone would not have been able to cause them. ...but that's of course hard to tell without really studying and professionally evaluating Andy's brain on a neurological level, my own argument simply being "Come on, man!". It's also easy for a psychopath to invent a molestation story out of nowhere, and then blame everything on that, and Andy has been known to lie whenever it suits him. Alex then finally gets on with attempting to debunk sources. For the first source - Condy Et Al (Archives of Sexual Behavior, VoL 16, No. 5, 1987 - Parameters of Sexual Contact of Boys with Women): https://web.archive.org/web/20180527005054/http://sci-hub.tw/10.1007/bf01541421 - he isn't satisfied with the sample size being under one thousand, and that it only asked the studied about their opinions (regarding their feelings about it and its effect on their sex life), as opposed to a "proper psychological study". He then spergs out again, citing a mantra about how it's all abuse.
His fallacy is that he's putting the cart before the horse: Opinions and feelings of patients should be the basis of psychological evaluations, and should be defining what is abuse or not. If abuse was just having a pleasant experience and feeling no untoward effects from it, then what would be the point of demonizing the concept of abuse? No victim - no crime. The sample size can't really be judged unless there's another study with a much bigger sample size. Since people willing to talk about child sex openly, is pretty hard to get a sample of, you make do with what you've got. Alex promizes to then respond with a more nuanced study, which he believes to be much more in depth. I guess the reason for why he isn't presenting it now, is because he wants people to watch the whole video.
Alex claims that the second source - Arreola Et Al (Childhood Sexual Abuse and the Sociocultural Context of Sexual Risk Among Adult Latino Gay and Bisexual Men): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2865208/ - "actually debunks him". ...but this is a complete fabrication. Alex later shows some carefully cherrypicked snippets from the study, that deals with how homophobia and FORCED sex AGAINST the child's will, will cause trauma, while he repeatedly ignores citations such as "We found no differences in psychological distress outcomes between those who reported not having sex before age 16 years compared with those who reported having consensual sex before age 16 years.".
The third source - https://www.b4uact.org/know-the-facts/ - he accuses of being biased. The source is a group of therapists, who have studied the demeanor of pedos, and concluded that they're good people. Their mission statement is that of your average therapist group, so there's nothing biased there. Alex does refer to some event in Baltimore, that left the public "disgusted, distraught and horrified", but since he doesn't go into it, putting on a foreboding voice and referring to unmentionable things, is just Lovecraftian storytelling: We just have to IMAGINE the blood sacrifices going on in the name of Lord Satan. Alex sees destigmatization of pedos as horrific, even in the frame of them being mentally ill, and that's discrimination against mentally ill people. Officially YouTube counts mentally ill people as vulnerable individuals, and stigmatizing against them is against the rules.
Alex then says that he will "debunk the hell out of" Amos. He lists different things that fall under the current definition of abuse, and then shows a list of signs of abuse, and at 23:00, Alex shows just how dishonest he's being himself, by saying "what ca- what happens". He is trying to say that ANY of the forms of the abuse will ALWAYS result in signs, and always in severe signs, but his subconscious knows better, and so he has to correct "what can happen" into "what happens". Speaking of bias, the NSPCC is also an organization for preventing harmful forms of abuse, and so the list won't contain consentual sex, since that's irrelevant to it. The list at 23:27 is a bit laughable. It's meant to be a list of what to watch out for, but Alex instead presents things like "playing less videogames" as harmful. All throughout these lists, Alex chooses to completely ignore the words "can", "may" and "might" that is always present.
Finally Alex goes in for his ultimate gotcha, to debunk Amos "fully, 100%". ...except that there's one word in his whole citation that makes it invalid: "Unwanted". The statistics that he's citing (where 71% of women, and 69% of men, did NOT want any psychiatric help after being sexually abused) defined sexual abuse as UNWANTED contact. It says nothing about wanted contact. ...and beyond this, there's still the issue of correlation and causation to consider: Mentally ill people are more likely to lie about having been abused, and are also especially vulnerable to abuse and situations that lead to abuse. Saying that abuse leads to mental illness, over something as unsubstantial as an anonymous mail questionaire, is seriously lacking in credibility.
>>7455 >Alex promizes to then respond with a more nuanced study, which he believes to be much more in depth. He never did that, though. A list of symptoms - if that's what he meant - isn't "naunced", since it doesn't have any place for liking "the abuse", or being indifferent to it. Amos's study was more nuanced there. ...and he doesn't mention a bigger sample size either. There's a meta study at the end, but he doesn't mention any sample sizes there either. Still, I'm kind of impressed by Alex's attempt. He didn't sperg out that much, and he provided sources, and read Amos's studies (although only every other word of them, it seems).
Oh, but what's this? Amos's former girlfriend "Lola" a.k.a. Brie, comes out as having been only 14 at the time of them dating, and later having called the cops on him, and is now preaching to his opponents on a stream, telling them of how she sent him childporn of herself? ...and how she only dated him to ruin him because she's a "map hunter"? Amos, no! What have you done?! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Js2kElAfrkc Well, apparently since you then claimed to not be a virgin anymore, I guess underage sex can be added to that - I haven't even finished watching the video yet.
...and this "Lola", Amos apparently made an admin to his Matrix server, and she sent her phone to the police, and she has illegal pictures that Amos asked for.
"he would ask me for nudes 3-4 times a day and when i said no he would throw a fit. He was abusive manipulative and he cheated on me with a girl he believed to be 14" Amos, this - if this isn't just bullshit - would be abusing somebody. Pressing somebody for nudes, being manipulative, and also cheating on somebody, that's being an abusive boyfriend. It's not a wife beater, but it's also not the innocent person that people like to have around children, for the above exact reasons. You need to learn, Amos: Women are sent by the devil from hell, to seduce men and ruin their lives. If they have a soul, it is full of evil, and they shall betray you. Women - not even once.
Oh, and she contacted his former handler at ICE and DHS too, and there's talk about deportation now. I feel like the next video Amos makes, has to be on how to treat a little girl right. ...not that you have to - June would agree - but that's what the public would like to know at this point: How abusive can you be to a child while you're dating her/him? What should ideally be legally allowed?
...and since "Lola" had access to Amos's whole "pedo community", she's named names, on the stream, and she says she has pictures of what they look like as well. I'd imagine that she'd shared these names and pictures with the police as well. ...like for example "John" constantly asking for pictures. ...and she's also turned to Shoe0nHead directly, offering to give her any evidence she wants, of "pedos being snakes", et cetera. Expect a new video from her within a week. ...and have you seen the detention centers Trump has erected for Mexicans awaiting deportation, Amos? There's a thread on here somewhere, that talks about cages and torture and shit. Let's for your sake hope that you're only going to PRISON while waiting to be deported back to Singapore. ...so that there's only the overhanging threat of being Epstein-ed. I don't dislike you, Amos, but I'm being realistic. You better have some aces up your sleeve to counter all of this. Deploy your squad of pedo ninjas and set this right.
...and among the pedos in your community, there's even a guy running for office, and his name is something like "Nathan Marsen"? Do you have any idea about the damage you've caused by allowing a woman to run things?! ...and she has a video of meeting privately with Youth Liberation, and a week or two later she's sending nudes? ...to him as well, or just to you? ...and the fucking kicker is that she used to hang with "the pedohunter community", and you probably KNEW this, but you STILL had to date her AND put her in charge of things. ...and so now she's apologized to her old friends, and boy does she have fuel now. Amos, I told you once before, that you were addicted to losing. THIS is what being addicted to losing looks like. This is knowing that you might fuck up bad, and still not giving a shit. This is having no selfpreservation instincts.
Meanwhile, people have been prodding Amos up for office: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNfE2bHOvYI Apparently he's a good person who wouldn't do nothing. Now, you have to understand that pedohunters invent shit all the time. They'll fake PMs, forum posts, lie in witness statements - the works - because falsifying evidence is secondary to jailing a pedo. I get this. ...but either way - guilty or not - (as Metokur says) "we're going to see some shit". You'll get the attention you're craving. ...and she claims to have video evidence, Amos. That's harder to make up. That has to be done with either clever camera angles or deepfakes. ...and if it's true what she's said about the cops having a casefile on you since months back, they've no doubt already monitored your server. ...and seen things firsthand. I don't know whether or not you had me blocked at this point, but I warned you about the illusion of safety and anonymity in Discord servers as well. Those "private" chatrooms, they never end well. You better have kept those servers clean and legal, you know, beyond abusing a 14 year old or two yourself. It makes the difference when determining if you're just going back to jail yourself, or if you're taking people down with you, and how many that would be. It's like you're your own worst enemy. I STILL don't 100% trust that you're not a living honeypot, instead of just very - How did Alex put it? - "risk-taking". Get a lawyer, Amos. Tell people that "you did not have sexual relationships with that woman". ...but most of all, can you please stop dating underage girls, and giving them reasons to hate pedos? That's like the lowest bar for being a pedo spokesperson.
Oops! Forgot the pic.
I also get the feeling that we as an audience to this drama, is getting played. I just don't know by whom yet. It's just a little convenient: If "Brie" (Not her actual name.) is even real, then Amos must have known for months, that something bad would come out of him playing her like he did. If she genuinely didn't eat "for weeks", she must have said something to Amos, and so Amos must have known that she was unhappy, and that shit would eventually hit the fan once she left as an admin of his board. ...and yet he doesn't mention it. He just reappears and acts like his old self, talking about how innocent pedos are, and how he now has a new higher moral standard of four instead of babies, while knowing that he's made a child suffer, if that's even true in the first place. Did he honestly think that she'd just keep quiet, and let him continue to be a shining example, after the witchhunt that happened to ProJared? There's also very few screenshots we're being served, and so I wonder if there's any apologies for any bad behavior from his side. We certainly aren't getting anywhere near the full picture from Brie. You also have the convenience of Shoe's video. She sounds like a lunatic, rambling on about pedos, and that's her M.O., but it all makes too perfect sense once Brie comes along. Did Brie tweet her before or after that video went up? Is Shoe and Skeptic smart enough to set anyone smarter than DSP up?
Irate Alex has now released a second part of his so called "debunking" of Amos. Maybe he'll do better this time, now that he's had some critique for his blatant cherrypicking of the studies. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouzP8i5rvf8 However, as if the first part wasn't long enough, this part is a full hour long. Why? Who would watch this? It should be a simple thing to debunk sex with four year olds, shouldn't it? ...so why is it now the length of a short movie? Although I feel a sort of commitment, I honestly don't know if I have the time to put up with this smug asshole (Alex) for a full hour. Thirty minutes of it was quite enough, but we'll see. At this point I'm more entertained by what comes out of the Brie accusations, because that's a side of Amos that people haven't seen yet: Never mind the age - how do you with good conscience break down a partner to the point where she won't eat, and just keep asking her for nudes non-stop? Were you SELLING her nudes to make money, or what?
...but since Amos is taking his time to respond, or maybe avoiding it completely (which would be a good legal tactic), I'll try to channel him, because I think I've got him roughly figured out by now: "Well, you gotta understand, that when you get horny, then you want something to fap to. I mean fuck fapping to just ones imagination, when she's just one pic away! ...and I honestly don't see what the big deal is - why she would sometimes bitch about it, and be such a big drama queen about it. You see your body all the time, and you get to see my body all the time, and I can assure you that I can still eat after I've taken my clothes off. ...and so in the end I decided that I just had enough of all the bitching and crying. There are four year olds who cry way less than then she did - just seek help, dude! Stop being so goddamn insecure about your sexuality! I honestly don't understand what the fuck she wanted from me. You get to enjoy me - every beautiful inch of The Amos Yee - and I'm not good enough for you? My goddamn nudes aren't good enough for you? I mean what the fuck?! Get lost, bitch!"
When talking about blame, it's also worth pointing out that Brie will likely be charged (as a delinquent) for distributing child pornography. It doesn't matter that the images are of herself. Ironically, she is now seeking to deport the one guy who were fighting to free her of such wrongdoing. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2019/08/court-girl-broke-child-porn-law-by-texting-explicit-video-of-herself/ I also find it highly suspicious that the pedohunters brought along a minor to a pedo haven, if it wasn't to entrap people. At the very least, it's child endangerment.
I say that I don't dislike Amos, but there are actually ways in which I do. Amos is what we've got right now (although I'm not certain for how long) - Amos is brave and uncompromizing, and digs up facts - but ultimately he's the wrong man for the job, and the reason is this: Amos doesn't understand love. He understands sex, and he understands attraction, but he doesn't understand things like caring for the emotions of partners, or the concept of intimacy, and the bonding and dependency it brings, or the purpse of these things. He doesn't understand that a child is emotionally vulnerable. To Amos sex is all about feeling good, like watching a movie: You rub things and then you feel good. This was obvious before Brie. I don't think he even understands why sex with babies would be wrong. That he's talking about marriage in one of the screencaps, is baffling. I guess he's more thinking of an everyday orgy when he hears "marriage", and the way he's talking about it, sounds like kidnapping - taking away the child from its parents and friends. I'm not sure if Amos is a sociopath or a psychopath, or if he's just especially horny, but what's clear is that there's something emotionally lacking in him on a neurological level. I have to wonder whether he's been seriously emotionally neglected by his parents/parent, and is just passing this neglect along, not knowing any better. Part 1/2
Part 2 ...and when Amos Yee is the voice of reason - the goddamn Batman for the movement - then we have a problem. Leon - having had his brain eaten away by shrooms - has an even lesser grasp on reality. I certainly wouldn't entrust my child into the care of either of these people. With saner people like Jenn gone, the outright lunacy is high in the pedo community, maybe because a lunatic would require a partner to be a child, for it not to have problems with their lunacy. It's like we can't handle an adult partner for one reason or another - that we're too mentally vulnerable for that. ...so now more than ever, am I having a crisis of faith in pedophilia. Lowering the age of consent would be letting these people have access to children, and that legit scares me.
This ties into the concept of sex for fun: How you are legally allowed to be slut in today's society, but also expected to not be seduced and exploited for sex, because you're old enough to know how to take care of yourself. To some sex is an intimate thing, and to others it's not, and the combination of these two types of people will result in traumatic relationships regardless of age. That's why marriage was mandatory until a hundred years ago when the sluts decided to rise up in the form of a feminist movement. ...and I think that there IS a fix for this. If an adult wants to get sexual with a child, then do a psych-evaluation of him, to determine if he'd be a supportive partner. It's like with adoptive parents: You determine if they're suitable enough. Scan his brain for psychopathy as well, since this is the most important illness to catch. Hopefully this will exclude people like Amos, who only thinks of sex as a form of entertainment, and people like Leon, who's too schizophrenic.
...and no, June, this would exclude you and Skeptic as well. You would not be suitable. This is the reason why you're against pedophilia in the first place: Because you don't get how people can bond and love eachother in a healthy way.
New Kino video up - "Shoe0nhead is too Rude to Pedophiles Part 1": https://www.freespeechtube.org/v/1099 (...although it's kinda part 2.)
Kino completely disregards the Brie personal drama, which may annoy pedos and antipedos alike, but keeping silent is actually the best he can do about the situation. If you thought he'd run out of resources, you'd be wrong, although these additional links are to testamonies - not scientific studies: Write-Up on how power dynamic between children and adults does not necessitate that a sexual act between them is harmful: https://www.ipce.info/host/sandfort_87/chapter2.htm (Ctrl+F ‘Power Difference’) Anecdote of 15-Year-Old Kirk Douglas losing his virginity to a teacher: http://web.archive.org/web/20080327125654/http://www.nypost.com/seven/01242007/gossip/pagesix/pagesix.htm Cases of Children being pressured by Police to claim their consensual sexual act with an adult was harmful when it wasn’t, and the guilt and trauma they face afterwards: https://www.ipce.info/host/radicase/chap04.htm (Ctrl + F ‘forced confession’) https://www.ipce.info/host/rivas/boys_men/chris.htm
At his FreeSpeechTube account ( https://www.freespeechtube.org/user/kino ) Kino chose to not reupload his first video - "Amos Yee Vs Youth Liberation (Pedophile Activism, Conspiracy Theories etc.)", and it is thus gone from the internet. (I checked with Google, but Bing might yield more hits.) However, I happened to have downloaded that particular video, so while I understand Amos's reasoning behind removing it, I can release it if there's ever a large demand for it. (Basically the debate starts out well, but as Leon gets higher and higher, he gets into such "mind expanding" topics, that Amos just "politely" cancels the debate. For example, we learn that Leon believes in the existence of David Icke's reptilians, but also just how stingy Amos can be with his judgement of said things. I think both sides ended up hurt by this, Leon declaring some kind of war on skeptics or something.)
Of course Amos isn't the only one being an active advocate. I have many links to pedos active on YouTube. It's just that it appears that if you mention such channels too much, they'll just get their channels shut down by antipedo mass flaggings. ...but if you're tired of my ramblings, maybe you like this guy's ramblings better: https://tomocarroll.wordpress.com/2019/08/
I think it's worth pointing out (together with Cog) that Amos Yee is just an attention whore. Just listen to this quote: "People think you need to be a moderate, or an independent, or a neutral, and they’re wrong, you need to pick an extreme. You need to pick a side with a yes or no answer. That’s how you attract people to you. If you’re too focused on being a moderate, if you try to approach the middle to appeal to moderates, you become indistinguishable from them and your message becomes diluted." Oh, I'm sorry, that recent quote was actually from Mister Metokur - the guy who ACCUSED Amos of being an attention whore. My bad.
Part 2 of Kino's response to Shoe, is now up: https://www.freespeechtube.org/v/109j
Amos continues to make excellent points in this part. In the end he says that it's only a matter of time before the pedos begin to rise up. There are no new links in this part (at least at time of writing). Amos also promises a part 3. Just like in part 1, I thought the whole response was done, but maybe he's hoping to trigger another response from Shoe. Meanwhile Shoe - like a happy little pig - has moved on to harping on a cartoon creator pedo who was fired from her job a whole nine years ago, so I don't think that's likely. "Look at this! Twerking Powerpuff Girls! This makes me feel creepy! Muh feels!" Shoe seems to really revel in her own bigotry for some reason, and as long as gender isn't involved, she sees nothing wrong with it, because that gender is okay, comes from her personal relationship with a transperson. If that person wouldn't have been a part of June's social life, June would probably have been Hitler today. This is in turn typical feminine/feline behavior: Just pet them kindly enough, and they'll believe anything.
Kino has now uploaded another video, titled "Combat Wombat Pedophilia Debate": https://www.freespeechtube.org/v/109v He's also finally uploaded an edited down version of the old debate with Youth Liberation (that sticks to the topic): https://www.freespeechtube.org/v/10B0 Youth Liberation - the Malcolm X of pedophilia - is over on FreeSpeechTube as well: https://www.freespeechtube.org/user/Morphintous (He has a lot more videos than Kino on his channel, but he also covers a lot more topics, like religion and anti-state.) Browsing YouTube a bit for videos opposing Amos, I see three more videos about him over there, two of which are from his country of origin Singapore, but right now I don't have the time to watch them.
I think that overall, Amos is continuing to make the mistake to think that there is an "age of consent" at all. As he himself points out, age is not a good proof of consent. Some children develop faster than other children. Some people - like psychopaths - are even mentally retarded for live, never being able to handle consequences at all. ...and so I propose a licence for consent: You can, at ANY age, go and take a school test, answering questions that show that you have a good understanding of sex and sexual relations. You could even get a grade on it, in case people only want to date A+ students in the subject. Use pencils or crayons to fill in the test - I don't give a f-k. You can take this test as many time as you'd like, but maybe only once a year. An alternative would be a face-to-face interview, but these would require a lot of personel, in order to cover basically an entire population, so maybe you could only do that with smaller children and other doubtful cases. ...and once you have your proof of consent licence, then all you need to do is to show it to your partner, or maybe he can go search some government archive for it, and you're good to go.
Amos is on fire right now: Two more videos are up on his channel at this point, but I haven't finished listening to the Combat Wombat "debate" at this point. I'm only at the beginning of it, but this Wombat seems to be the average amount of daft that you'd expect from a run-of-the-mill "skeptic" YouTuber: Circular reasoning, assertions, et cetera. I really admire Amos's patience with these guys, because it seems that Wombat isn't really there to debate, as much as he is there to virtue signal and tell Amos off for "having wrong opinions". ...but maybe that will change as the debate progresses.
12:08 is pretty laughable. Wombat thinks that not only wouldn't he be able to understand what sex is at 13, but that his dick would start hurting from it. This is what antipedos actually believe.
"It's common sense." "It's illegal for a reason." I really don't think I can stand any more of Wombat's stupidity at this point. I might have to move on to other videos. Amos sure knows how to pick low hanging fruit. ...and I guess that's fine, because even if it's just teaching idiots the basics of how to reason properly, it's progress toward a more intelligent and rational society. ...but then again: Do potato farmers need to know how to run a government?
>>7491 ...and just in case there's any doubt: I've been inside another child at the age of 12, and it didn't hurt anyone of us, neither physically, nor mentally. (Breaking the hymen doesn't count, of course.)
The first new video is the final third part of his response to Shoe: https://www.freespeechtube.org/v/10BJ ...while the second video is just a plug for his blog ( https://kinodiaries.wordpress.com/ ): https://www.freespeechtube.org/v/10Bj He's updated his blog too, going into the validity of his studies - a thorough, scientific deep-dive into what actually makes a study valid. I'm actually surprised that there's so much research having been done, considering that antipedos were quick to shut down and condemn pedo research centers with prejudice.
I remember "being sexually abused" as a child. I don't know how old I was, but there was this cousin of mine who wanted to put his dick in my ass, without lube, and I think he just exploited my ignorance. I tried to "loosen up" my anus, but as you might understand, he wasn't getting anywhere without lube, and so he had to give up. This isn't the only story of when teens and adult tried to seduce me merely for the sake of casual sex - something that I as a person isn't into. ...but here's the thing: I'm not mentally hurt. There wasn't sexual intercourse involved, but at least "molestation" I can confirm doesn't bother a child, and that's because it takes puberty to make sexual touching matter. My cousin just wanted to feel good with my body, and I wouldn't have minded letting him use me all the way. I'm not gay at all, but I was just being nice to him. Molestation doesn't matter to children. It only matters to adults, because then it begins to actually mean something personal.
>>7495 ...and it's not like it's anything big or important either. That so called "attempted childrape" of me, is just something that I have to consciously remember from the back of my mind, that "Oh, yeah, technically, I guess that was illegal.". Who the fuck cares? I hope he's not feeling any guilt over that, because the "trauma" from that is absolutely zero.
In his response to Shoe, Amos says that consensual sex is inherently positive. I've talked about just how shallow Amos's understanding of sex seems to be, before. When you hit puberty around 13, sex start to mean something personal. This means that you can be seduced into saying yes to sex, and enjoy sex, but then ending up feeling betrayed, or just end up in a bad relationship that a child would have difficulty predicting. A fruitful relationship with a child can happen, but there's also potential for bad apples exploiting children, and that's why there is a law: To protect these few cases where a child couldn't fully grasp the surrounding situation, because it didn't have the wisdom of an adult, and then ended up bonding to somebody whom weren't an optimal partner for it. Even if a child has sex without attachments, just for fun, that child can grow up to face partners who will shame them for not being virgins, or for "being a slut". There is a difference between beginning to think in abstracts at the age of 12, and mastering it for something as important as whom to marry and spend the rest of one's life with. Even at the age of 25, people rush into relationships which they later regret. It can happen at all ages, but the risk is lesser when you've matured a bit. ...so I think that Amos is reaching a bit here. Bear in mind, though, that plenty of countries have an AoC of 13-15, without their societies collapsing. 18 (for the US) is a pretty absurdly high AoC.
...but other than the AoC issue, I completely agree with removing the stigma for pedophilia, or ANY philias and attractions. Call me crazy, but I'd like to fuck some celebrities. ...but despite these "urges", and my fap folder of them being huge, I think I'll be able to keep my penis in my pants and not actually run after them. There's nothing morally wrong with feeling an abnormal attraction, no matter what it is.
I wonder if there's any gay people upset about Shoe's insinuation that sexualities can be cured through therapy. ...because if pedos should go to therapy, that must imply that it helps, and so it would help in the same way for homosexuals and transsexuals, if they'd only choose to be straight.
>>7498 Sexualities and fetishes, are really more innocent than fantasies, because if I'd want to assassinate Trump, I should be free to make art about it and write fanfics about it, but there's still some kind of independent will behind a fantasy, that people can call into question. Not if there's a sexual attraction, though. If I get AN ERECTION from thinking about assassinating Trump, then there's really nothing I can do about that. I might even LOVE Trump, and find it to be the ultimate evil to assassinate him, but that doesn't make my erection go away. I sometimes fap to snuff and rape, and all kinds of evil stuff, because evil turns me on. ...but that's just me getting off. Once I've finished masturbating, I immediately return to a mindset where I know what's right and wrong. Arousal isn't rational. It just is.
So allegedly, these nudes (in their uncensored versions) were sent to "Brie", proving that something untoward was going on. This could still be bullshit. Especially that second pic hints as a penis with a shape that this planet has never seen.
Gotta love how he victory poses after he's cum: "I always win these races, bitch, and that's why they call me The King. I'm not even going to throw my shirt in the hamper - I'll wear these stains with pride."
I guess this takes Amos out of that run for office, whatever it was.
I'm detecting some jealousy amongst the antipedos.
Brie was already involved in a court case? So spreading CP isn't her first offence then.
For all you Amos fans who fantasize about what it would be like to be intimate with Amos, here's some chat logs that you can pleasure yourselves to.
The reason I'm posting these, is because they're already out there and circulating at this point. (That's where I got them from.) I'm really not adding any extra harm to him. It's also worth pointing out that - according to the first screencap - Amos wanted to wait until his girl was 18 and legal, before getting married, so he has SOME respect for the law at least.
Amos has updated his blog with a post-debate discussion between him and Combat Wombat. I couldn't endure his stupidity, so I turned the video off, but Wombat verifies that he wasn't really out to debate Amos, but to humiliate him. He doesn't really care about things like right and wrong, as long as he gets to eat cake and laugh at people. (Okay, I'm paraphrasing here.) We also get Amos mentioning the Brie debacle, saying that it's a low personal attack, that it was years ago, and that he's "apologized for it and retracted it"(???), and that it's all lies. It's actually possible that Brie was an adult, since she has an adult voice, but otherwise these screencaps are looking pretty damning. If I would watch the entire Wombat debate, I'd probably find out more, but fuck that dumbass.
>>7512 I've now browsed through the entire Wombat debate, and there was no mention of Brie. If it happened at all, it must have went by in about 60 seconds. Wombat really is as thick as they come. The "humiliation" that I guess that Wombat must have meant, consisted of letting Amos talk, and just still calling it disgusting. Even for a YouTuber, that's braindead. I'm just getting a mental image of Amos being invited into a truckload full of horseshit, being handed a spoon, and being told that it can't be all shit all the way down, the joke being that it's just all horseshit. ...but I guess that's antipedos for you.
In some sense I get that it's a personal attack to bring up Brie, but on the other hand, if he's actually caused mental harm to a 14-year-old, while acting like he's one of the non-abuse pedos, then maybe he's wrong about pedos being able to be guaranteed non-abusive within a relationship. ...so in a way it's very relevant. Did it happen at all? Was he abusive? Did she cry? Did he know? It's like he's his own example, unless he claims to not be one of the ideal pedos himself. His answer to Wombat is still pretty unclear. I don't know if Metokur has time to address this, but I don't expect this to be over. The police may have filed away his case under a pile of more important cases, but that can change if it gets enough media attention, even if "it was years ago". ...and in a sense, I also want Amos to do some soul-searching, to make sure that it doesn't happen again. It's not the age of Brie that I care about, but the abusive behavior that she claims (if she's even being honest).
>>7515 The thing is, that if this goes to trial, the cops will break down his door and take his computer and any storage media they see lying around, and probably never return it to him ever, and that could be a bigger loss to him than the trial itself: All his contact information, all his files, et cetera. It's not something to take lightly. These confiscations is why pedos kill themselves before their trials.
"I didn't read shit, but I can say 'Period!' with conviction." - Combat Wombat
>>7517 No, wait! He DID allegedly read the studies, but "they were just theories - not ethics". What a clown. Apparently somewhere there are ethic-ists writing the REAL papers, void of any scientific theories.
I also missed THIS from Amos, claiming that the leaks are all fake and taken out of context, "or he would have been arrested already". I read his latest entry very sloppily - sorry. Yes, the sources are shady, but what exactly is taken out of context here? Maybe we'll never get an answer to this, and that's kind of understandable, but I'd still like an answer. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0pqp1sF7AI (at 2:43) "I want you to explain, Amos: Why does she have your nudes?" This is trolly as fuck.
>>7519 Meanwhile I bet Chris Hansen is waiting to take your call, if you want exposure, Amos. He's doing YouTube streams now, so it's like the perfect opportunity (once he's done with Ice Poseidon). You could teach him a thing or two. It would be epic.
Since he's leaving this up to my imagination, I'll just have to imagine this conversation taking place: "Hi, Amos. I'm a 25 year old researcher from Australia, and we're doing a study on extraordinary penises right now, and we've heard that you have what's known as a 'shocker', where your penis actually splits in half to allow for simultaneous vaginal and anal penetration. Would you mind showing us, and the world? It's for research purposes." "Okay, but are you sure that no minor will be exposed to this? See, I'm a public figure." "I assure you that it's completely confidential. Also, would you like to marry me in three and a half years? I'm still 25, by the way."
Amos finally "comes clean" about the "14-year-old": https://www.freespeechtube.org/v/10bt His main argument is that "There is no evidence that she's 14.". I'm not a legal expert in US law, but isn't "She told me she was 18!" a meme of a failed legal defense? Aren't you supposed to make sure that she's of legal age before you get intimate to any degree? ...but I'm actually satisified with Amos's side of the story. If the antipedos now want to prove that she is indeed 14, or directly pursue legal action, then the ball is in their court now. The claim that she's NOT 14 at all, is actually credible, considering that antipedos are doing things like abusing childporn report forms en masse in order to massflag MAP:s off of Twitter as we speak. The extent that some people will go to, in the name of their personal feels, sickens me. ...and yes, of course there is no law against "being a dick" against adults. This is America, after all.
...and Amos is back on Youtube as Kino again: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCPXiH4Y8tWPc6lLHyrYmQaA Hopefully he now has a better grasp on the YouTube "terms of service", if such a thing is even a thing on that site in practice. At the time of writing, Amos only has one video uploaded: The one regarding whether he abused a 14-year-old or not. I don't see it breaking any rules, so maybe he can play things smart and avoid the AoC topic on YouTube, while recommending his off-site account. I still think that making a pure mirror site, is the way to go, i.e. claiming to be a fan while showing off off-site content. It's a proven tactic that YouTube support seems powerless against. I recommended for him to age-restrict his videos, in case that makes any difference, but who knows if he's reading comments or not? (I gave up trying to call him Kino. He's Amos to the world, and I think kino is already a thing.)
Oh, I see: This Kino account is talking about Amos in third person, both in the video description and the comments, so either this is a clumsy naming of a fan account, or Amos is just being weird.
"Hi, I'm Kino." "We know." "Oh, you must be confusing me for that other guy who just left, who was also named Kino, and who looked exactly like me, but I swear to you: I'm not him. ... He is a pretty great guy, though."
░▄▄░░▄░░░▄░░▄▄░░░▄▄▄░░░▄░░▄░▄▄▄▄░▄▄▄▄░ █▄▄█░█▀▄▀█░█░░█░▀▄▄░░░░▀▄▄▀░█▄▄░░█▄▄░░ █░░█░█░░░█░▀▄▄▀░▄▄▄▀░░░░▐▌░░█▄▄▄░█▄▄▄░ ▄░░▄░▄░▄░░▄░░▄▄░░ █▄▄▀░█░█▀▄█░█░░█░ █░░█░█░█░░█░▀▄▄▀░
The Singaporean press has written a few articles on Yee, the latest being today, from their version of The Independent: http://theindependent.sg/amos-yee-resurfaces-after-long-hiatus-says-most-pedophiles-just-want-a-friendly-loving-relationship-with-children/ http://theindependent.sg/exclusive-with-amos-yee-hes-been-busy-making-pro-pedophilia-videos-and-does-not-care-for-singapore-anymore/ The articles doesn't add much to what we already know, but it's fun to see him get press coverage, even it's from a country with such limited freedom of speech, that officially hates him.
Missed this hot POV shot of Amos from the leaks. Schlick-schlick-schlick-schlick-schlick-schlick... <3
>>7507 Brie: "ah yes you have a 14 year old gf you cant meet for 3 1/2 years" Amos: "meh" This could possibly be AFTER they sent nudes to eachother, though - who knows? What I find damning regardless, is that Amos let an antipedo "MAP-hunter" admin his servers, and just casually throws another pedo under the bus to cover his own ass: "Well if I'd be guilty, then what about THIS guy, who had SEX with her?" ...so what we can learn from this, is to not trust Amos, and not be a part of his inner circle. His videos are great, but he might as well be another "MAP-hunter" trying to pull people into his Discord servers to out them. Who knows if it was Brie who was seduced by Amos into becoming pro-pedo, or Amos who was seduced by Brie into becoming anti-pedo? In any case, he's irresponsible enough to betray a MAP relationship when put under pressure, and that should at least be a warning signal to at least stay out of Discords in general. Don't put your freedom in the hands of a stranger. ...unless it's Gadmin. Only trust Gadmin. <3
Meet Melissa Chen - the human rights activist who only want rights for SOME humans. If you find yourself masturbating to old men axing fish in the middle of the arctic, then you might have a problem.
>>7530 With one mighty, determined swing, the seasoned man thrusted his huge, powerful tool into the tender flesh, burying it up to the thick hilt. As the full girth embedded into the very deepest recesses of her gash, Melissa found herself powerless against the merciless onslaught. She could only gasp as the convulsions wrecked her body in one throb after another, squeezing the warm, stiff blade with all its might. "Oh God, Amos...", she managed to groan out as her consciousness faded before this ultimate of extacies.
...but hold up: Damian Skyfire is on the case. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GChVfSHerTU I've never heard so much non-stop butthurt in my life. This is the incoherent crying of an anal rape victim post rape. "Intellectual honesty" apparently begins with looking in the mirror and just realizing that you're wrong. "My take's the popular opinion here, so that's gotta tell you something.", he concludes - a Grade A intellectual.
>>7532 ...and when you call him out on him acting like a tough guy on the internet, he of course pussies out and resorts to insulting your mother instead, so he hasn't even got that going for him. Where are the arguments, antipedos? Is there one of you without braindamage? It's a weird sensation when you feel ashamed for the other side.
Pay close attention, pedos: This is what it looks like when an internet toughguy encounters somebody who's the real deal.
In the end of the video, Amos asks if anybody knows any sites that's ACTUALLY about free speech for pedos. Do we know any such sites? :P (Can't wait for him to invite another Brie into the Discord. I still don't trust his judgement. :P )
Amos, no one cares. Even worse, if you're a fanboi KYS Above all, pick another board.
>>7541 >Above all, pick another board. I'm covering the political activism of a public figure granted political asylum for his political views. This is what Enrive's /pol/ was meant for. The changing of the Age of Consent laws, and the reasons why, is far more relevant to politics, than what the jews have been up to lately. Besides, the last political post not covering Amos, was made two WEEKS ago, so it's not like I'm in the way of anybody. Ideally I would cover EVERY pedo-political activist, but I just don't have the time to spare. Amos is especially important because he keeps getting shut down, and his sources and views deserve to get preserved somewhere. Besides, he's a cool guy. If I find more time, I'll also cover the political work of other activists, possibly in separate threads. Welcome to /pol/.
"Hear me out: If small children can possibly begin to understand abstract concepts at age 8, shouldn't we allow them to vote already?" Looking forward to Trump handing out lollipops to his voter base in 2020.
Want to follow Amos on Twitter? Well, although it seems that Amos does still have a Twitter account (at https://twitter.com/amosyee1 ), his last post from that account, was over a year ago. I think he's had other - more recent - Twitter accounts, but that they've been suspended for being too controversial. ...but the League of Shadows never rests, and my ninjas have informed me that he's made an account on an alternative Twitter today, called Baraag: https://baraag.net/@KinoIsHere
>>7544 I note that he's retracted his stance on the age of consent being lowered to four, and gone with abolishing it completely: "Whether a sex act is illegal should not be determined by age, but whether the act causes harm. Rape laws already exist to punish harmful sex acts. Age of consent simply exist to unjustly punish harmless sexual acts toward children" Maybe in ten years from now, we'll look back on the whole "age of consent" concept, and find it medieval and barbaric.
One of Amos's followers has made a thorough definition/mission statement of a whole political line: LoveUnitarianism.
Speaking of Baraag, that site has an excellent legal rights page on the topic of things like fictional childporn: https://baraag.net/about/more These legal cases are highly relevant, since some antipedo idiots are arguing that fictional porn is somehow illegal under US law, or that promoting pedophilia isn't covered by free speech. " - Since 2002, Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition established that two overbroad provisions of the CPPA of 1996 was struck down by the US Supreme Court because they abridged 'the freedom to engage in a substantial amount of lawful speech'. - The Court found the CPPA to have no support in Ferber since the CPPA prohibits speech that records no crime and creates no victims by its production. - Furthermore, district court Judge James E. Gritzner ruled in United States v. Handley that two parts of the PROTECT Act of 2003 criminalizing 'a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting' was unconstitutional." The various references are also linked on that page - I won't bother to directly link them in this thread.
Amos has updated his blog ( https://kinodiaries.wordpress.com/ ) but I've been too busy to post about it. This time the topic is power dynamics in relationships. Blog post lists a long discussion about a post originally made by Giovanni Liefdesmorgen ( https://twitter.com/Giovanni_Lief ). Giovanni's posts will be posted in image format following this post.
>>7549 Personally I find it weird how children are not supposed to be able to make their own decisions regarding sex, and not even adults are supposed to know what's best for the child, but that the state knows best. When it comes to children and sex, we let the state decide, and this blind faith would probably not be there if the state were to decide that children MUST have sex, whether they or their parents would like it or not. ...but in contrast, we are still scared of the power dynamics on a person-to-person level. We'll suspect somebody whom our child has personally come to know, but we trust the state to imprison people. What if the adult was a cop or a judge? Where would your trust be then? When do you trust the potential abuse of a "power dynamic", and when do you not?
Amos just released another video - "Irate Alex Denies Basic Pedo Facts": https://www.freespeechtube.org/v/10f5
At 3:30 of his new video, Amos refers to an interesting table, titled "Table 17-4 - Guilt and Anxiety as a Function of Consent and Knowledge in Childhood Sexual Experiences". This is in turn from a study titled "The Effects of Early Sexual Experiences: A review and Synthesis of Research" (or "Constantine, 1981" for short) by Larry L. Constantine ( https://www.ipce.info/library_2/files/constantine79.htm ). I will post my conclusions from this table below.
This table offers some resolution beyond just the question "How bad is sexual abuse?". (Keep in mind that "No anxiety/guilt" falls within the "Low anxiety/guilt" category.) We start out with a baseline at consensual sex, where the child was sexually knowledgeable - they knew what they were getting into, and they actively chose to do it: Low anxiety and low guilt. Not being aware of what sex is, will increase the anxiety one category across the board. "Passive consent" - just passively letting the sexual act happen - will increase the axiety one category, and if the child is also aware of the sexual taboos associated with it, it will also feel some (plus one category) guilt for letting it happen.
The table makes it clear that there are two sole reasons for the child taking on responsibility (i.e. "guilt") for the sex: One is their enjoyment of sex, i.e. it not being strictly forced upon them despite their protests. The other is being made to feel guilty by society. On the other hand, the trauma (anxiety) comes from ignorance of sex, passive consent, taboos, and especially rape (i.e. strictly forced). This in turn shows that actual rape is very bad, but also that being too dominant, keeping it ignorant of sex, and making it aware of cultural taboos, is also bad to a moderate degree.
I think that the laws should be changed accordingly (besides forced rape already being highly illegal): The following three things should be considered "sexual abuse" - a less severe crime: - Having sex with somebody who doesn't have sexual knowledge. - Having sex with a child who doesn't participate actively. - Instilling sexual shame in it, or making it otherwise aware of sexual taboos, like pedophobia.
Amos also brings up an antipedo argument that I haven't taken seriously before: That it risks spreading Aids to children. It's a pretty stupid argument, since it makes children a special case, whereas knowingly spreading Aids or other veneral diseases to people in general, is already illegal. It's causing bodily harm regardless of age, and is also completely irrelevant to healthy partners. It's the "gays spread Aids" scare all over again.
Fuck the laws! Anxiety is growth.
Amos's latest video adds two new sources to the list: Study indicating sexual acts at a younger age predicts less negative behaviour for a child ("Rethinking Timing of First Sex and Delinquency"): https://web.archive.org/web/20180527005057/http://sci-hub.hk/10.1007/s10964-007-9228-9 Study showing discovery of minor attraction happens at around age 15 and the negative psychological effects that cause them because of society’s hostility towards pedophiles ("Self-identifications, sexual development and well-being in minor-attracted people: an exploratory study"): https://www.ipce.info/library_3/files/brian_cash_thesis.htm (Ctrl + F ‘Discovery Experiences’ scroll till end)
Amos has uploaded another video - "Richard Stallman did nothing wrong Defending Pedophiles": https://www.freespeechtube.org/v/10fk
This recent video puts the video count at his channel ( https://www.freespeechtube.org/user/kino ) at 12, which - given his streetpreaching meanderings at last year's account - is about nine more than I thought we would get. These videos are incredible IMO. However, if they're going to be a weekly thing on a stable platform, then it will just take too much time to keep you up to date on a regular basis. For example, I was aware of Amos uploading this recent video after a mere minute of him uploading a mirror of it on YouTube ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JU7vPaNNxMA ) but it still took me a whole day to actually post about it here. ...so from now on, if you're interested, you can easily bookmark his pages and keep up-to-date with him yourself. I just won't be able to keep up.
For those of you who don't know who Richard Stallman is, he's the father of GNU: "Richard Stallman launched the GNU Project in September 1983 to create a Unix-like computer operating system composed entirely of free software. With this, he also launched the free software movement. He has been the GNU project's lead architect and organizer, and developed a number of pieces of widely used GNU software including, among others, the GNU Compiler Collection, GNU Debugger, and GNU Emacs text editor. In October 1985 he founded the Free Software Foundation." After his comments on Epstein's "victims", he and MIT was "put under pressure" by antipedos through "misunderstandings and mischaracterizations", leading to Stallman stepping down as president of the FSF yesterday, also leaving his ‘visiting scientist’ role at MIT. ( https://www.theverge.com/2019/9/17/20870050/richard-stallman-resigns-mit-free-software-foundation-epstein ) The late Marvin Minsky - implicated as having had sex with a 17-year-old under Epstein's orders - was a co-founder of MIT's AI laboratory, a cognitive scientist concerned largely with research of artificial intelligence (AI), and author of several texts concerning AI and philosophy. I think there's a clear correlation between brilliant minds, and questioning the US concept of Age of Consent (as if the rest of the world wasn't backing enough).
If you want to support Richard Stallman, then look no further than his homepage ( https://stallman.org/ ): "I am looking for a few more volunteers to help install new political notes on the site. If you'd like to help me in this way, please write to rms at gnu period org. "
"Don't rape me, bro!" ( https://www.freespeechtube.org/v/10fk at 6:45 )
Amos brings up Epstein like he's a pedophile. I'm really not informed on witness testamonies against Epstein, but that's not what I heard. From what I heard, Epstein EXTORTED pedophiles. There was all kinds of recordings and witnesses talking about OTHER people having sex with "his girls", but this means nothing. For all I know, he could have hated pedos, and just wanted to set them up because those were the kind of people whom he had no remorse about victimizing. ...so when Epstein went to prison, he had no friends: The antipedos regarded him as a pedo, while the pedos regarded him as an antipedo. ...and if you try to extort enough pedos in high places, it's not the antipedos that's going to assassinate you. That was likely a pedo OP.
Apparently Stallman has been known for speaking his mind for years, but the campaign to get him removed for his comments on Minsky-Epstein, was actually masterminded by a single person. Meet Selam Jie Gano, who describes herself as "MIT grad, robotics engineer, mixed", because race is important. https://medium.com/@selamie/remove-richard-stallman-fec6ec210794 https://selamgano.wordpress.com/experience/ So why did she do it? The first link will tell you that she did it just out of remorseless vindictiveness against all (quote) "shitty men". She thinks that being a genius isn't good enough for people have a job in STEM. Instead people also have to have nice personalities, because everything has to be a social game to women. If you don't have nice ideas that common stupid people agree with, you're (quote) "problematic" and have to be removed. Free thinking is not allowed. ...and with every genius removed, you will lower the talent within your field, until you might one day find yourself standing on TOP of the rubble, and all will be well, right? Take note: This is what women outside of the kitchen results in.
It's funny how Amos's defence of Stallman really isn't doing him any favours. (Yay - both English and American in a single sentence! I guess I'm "mixed" as well.) I don't think Stallman would be very fond of being described as "defending pedophiles". ...but I don't think Amos cares about Stallman's reputation, as much as he cares about the point he's making, which ironically is pretty Stallman of him.
So what has our favourite Ethiopian-Chinese mixed SJW been up to recently, in her "championing for all women in STEM" by making Vice write a smearpiece on him? Well, for some reason she suddenly decided to delete her resumé today ( https://selamgano.wordpress.com/experience/ ) , leaving only her Medium page ( https://medium.com/@selamie ), Instagram ( https://www.instagram.com/selamjie/ ) and her personal homepage ( https://tryingmyvest.com/about/ ) to describe her. She also wrote a new post on Medium. It's very long, but the gist of it is this: "They ask me what Richard Stallman did exactly, and many wonder if this was possibly an isolated incident that got overblown." "1. Richard Stallman has problematic opinions." Don't care. Go back to the kitchen, woman. To elaborate, personal opinions are a private matter - not a professional or educational one. What Selam is advocating, is the abolishment of the right to work - article 23.1 of the Universal Human Rights. If women don't like you, then you're not allowed to work.
"2. Richard Stallman has been contributing to a negative environment for women at MIT for over thirty years." Don't care. Go back to the kitchen, woman. Again, a school or a workplace isn't "a community" or "an environment". Welcome to the Western world. "3. Going Forward, be proactive instead of reactive." This is in response to this: "I understand, now, that powerful institutions will not remove their problematic members until we make it messy and public and awful. I am ready, now, to join others in calling for burning everything to the ground." ...but apparently what she meant wasn't to witchhunt people, but to install a system - a policy - that wouldn't allow "problematic" people into schools or work in the first place. She brings up MIT's MeToo and TIES TO SLAVERY policies. So: Is Selam as nutty as a negro, or is she as underhanded as a chinaman? Since her SJW terminology is so systematically trying to socially corrupt a place of work, I'm leaning toward the latter. This has to be deliberate sabotage, and if she isn't getting paid by the Chinese government for doing this, she should be.
It's funny, because if the US government would apply an "opinion policy" on their employees, then maybe they should look into if their Trident submarine nuclear missile systems have been sabotaged by a certain miss Selam Jie Gano while she was working there, since she doesn't care about professionalism one iota. Maybe that's why she deleted her resume: When getting put under the spotlight, the little Chinese saboteur is trying to cover up her previous ops.
By the way, 1-2 days ago Amos turned on his YouTube comments again. ...or at least started APPROVING his comments. I see none of the usual death threats so far. His Baraag account, on the other hand, seems to have stopped with the initial five posts. I hear there's a spam filter that caps the number of simultaneous posts at five, so maybe Amos hit that limit and just figured he'd find a better site. I'm glad he didn't get addicted to that, because Twitter addiction is real.
New video - "Anti-Pedophiles Ruin Richard Stallman's Life": https://www.freespeechtube.org/v/10fp (I won't bother to post images anymore.)
Stallman may be a genius, but seeing people hurt by their own misinterpretations, and going "I'm sorry for that hurt.", is pretty fucking dumb. What does it take for him to go "You know what? I was nowhere NEAR you when you did that, and so that's on you."? I don't know what sort of "pressure" made Stallman cave, but resigning because of misunderstandings, is just weak: "A psychic told me that you once raped a dog, and so quit your job." "Okay. ... I'm sorry."
If you want something more uplifting about Amos, try "Areum Ling Kaiya"'s channel ( https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCril2gWOmZP7Yze6MxxjL9w/videos ), where he's apparently campaigning for the 2020 presidential candidate Stetson Hardwick (which might or might not be fictional). Areum isn't much for making sense, and I suspect that he's done as many drugs as Leon has, but his videos really uplifts your spirits. Here's his most recent video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amxmja0NVGw
>>7542 > than what the jews have been up to lately. This IS what the Jews are upto you brainlet. (((Who))) do you think is behind the LGBTQP agenda? Lurk Moar
>>7578 >This IS what the Jews are upto you brainlet. Please link me to evidence where it says that Amos is jewish, or has jewish ancestors. This must be documented.
>>7577 Attention, all Amos ally fans. If you're in the area around Los Angeles, California, there's a campaign rally happening with Stetson Hardwick in just a few days. Here's the announcement: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKjyhUXE21E In case you missed it, it takes place at the 23rd of September, at 12:30 PM, at: Exodus Wellness Center 11905 South Central Ave, Suite. 303, Los Angeles, California 90050
>>7580 So what is the Exodus Wellness Center? Well, it seems to be a mental institution (not to be confused with the Exodus Wellness Center in Portland, Oregon that sells marijuana, although as I said, I have my suspicions about that). ...but don't let that disuade you. You get the chance to meet with an Amos supporter, and maybe even the future president of the Unites States! Ask if you can film the rally and upload it on YouTube for increased coverage.
I feel pretty bad for Amos. He's an intelligent guy. He doesn't deserve to be surrounded by mental weed misfits like this. Just let these guys be a lesson to you, fellow pedophilic gentlemen, to never smoke weeds or do other kinds of drugs. Weed does boost your confidence, but as you can obviously see, a boosted confidence does in turn damage your reasoning permanently.
Some RATM music to fight to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXmdVEkJKGg
New video: "Blaire White Discriminates Against Pedophiles" https://www.freespeechtube.org/v/10g5
Blaire White has been discussed in this thread already, but what's worth pointing out is the trend amongst transsexuals to just use fascist silencing tactics instead of arguments. It's a bizarre correlation, but I guess it stems from silencing methods (including mass hackings of YouTube) being their only "argument" for them not being the gender that they are. Once you can create a personal bubble strong enough to deny your own gender, then you will be impervious to truth and rationality, and are just looking for the noises to stop.
However, don't underestimate the transsexuals. They may be batshit crazy, but they have power. There is a non-zero chance that they'll try to convince law enforcement that some opinions are harmful to children, and end up criminalizing them, just like they've campaigned for calling them males to be a form of discrimination. It's really weird how freaks are trying to silence people for being freaks. There's just no solidarity among us.
I guess BW condemning and stalking people, is some twisted attempt to prove herself to her family, since her father's side disowned her. I think that socially, pedos are actually more accepted than transsexuals. Amos's only known parent doesn't mind. My parents don't mind. My girlfriend didn't mind. I don't recommend coming out as a pedo to your family and friends, because there's always a risk, but since it's not something we do 24/7, they don't have to deal with it. ...and it should be the same for transsexuals: If you feel like you're a woman, or like wearing women's clothes, then you can live perfectly fine with your feelings, without having to out yourself in public by overdoing your voice, or altering your body, or dressing in a special way. Transsexuality isn't a lifestyle by default. It's the people who obsess over this fetish/dysphoria/quirk, who turn it into a lifestyle. As a bearded lady, you can either just shave, or you can let it all grow out as long as possible, and then ask people why they're repulsed by you. However, I suspect that it's not just because BW is trans. She's obviously also a horrible person.
Simply put: Being a transsexual may not be a choice, but being a freak is.
...and of course people don't want to suffer you being a freak. Let's say that you're just a normal heterosexual guy who likes women. If you then go full Tom Green by wearing a giant penis hat everywhere you go, nobody will want anything to do with you. That's being perverted. That's pretty much next to whipping out your dick at the kitchen table, or wearing your bondage gear around the clock. That's what kind of transsexual Blaire White is. It may be edgy, it may be sick, but ultimately it's insufferable to people.
Anti-pedo Hatman made a response video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgAttec9hiY Don't know if I have the time to spare to look at it right now - we'll see.
Since Hatman brings up how Amos has retracted being sexual with babies, I'd like to point out that the weak grounds that he does it on, is no different than the weak grounds that the antipedo dismisses his own arguments with: "Obviously they lack the cognitive ability to consent." Besides Amos not mentioning any specific criteria here, I argue that he lacks an solid argument that a cognitive understanding should be needed to enjoy sex at all. Amos once held that position that as long as the baby ENJOYS it, it's okay, but not suddenly he's changed his mind, and he doesn't explain why all too well. Was it simply peer pressure that made him cave?
I also want to point out that Amos DENIES being a pedo in his most recent video, at length, and I'm annoyed by this hypocrisy. On his now banned Twitter, he clearly stated that he was a MAP (Minor Attracted Person). I get why he's going back into the closet, but he doesn't need to talk about himself at all. He can avoid the subject of his own personal attraction completely, since it's not even relevant.
>>7592 *now suddenly he's changed his mind
>>7581 Well, there was apparently no video footage of the rally ever taking place, but "Pedofish" (as people call him nonstop, but which he denies being) gives us his word that the rally has taken place and went well. I call bullshit. Still, I like his videos.
New video up: "I'm so Stressed....." https://www.freespeechtube.org/v/10gV
>>7596 In this video, we get to see a different, more personal, side to Amos. It's not just about having burnt himself out a bit with his comeback, but also about pessimistic and negative people causing themselves depression, recording technical troubles, and how Teddie is the best character in Persona 4 Golden. I think one video a week is quite enough. I'm good with one video a month. Most people prerecord videos in advance, so that they have a buffer of videos.
In the first video, Amos asks for Patreon donations. (His Patreon is https://www.patreon.com/kinoishere .) I'm fairly certain that he posted this video on YouTube, but it's not available there anymore, so it must have gotten removed. If you donate more than $5, you get the option to be credited in his videos. (You also have the option to remain anonymous if you message him.) Amos suspects that his Patreon might not be around forever, so if you wish to donate to him, time is of the essence. At the time of writing, he's getting $23 a month from two patreons.
In his second video, he ponders about the kind of influential power he has. He mentions TJ Kirk (The Amazing Atheist) being a big inspiration to him. I don't know how TJ feels about pedophilia or the age of consent, but it's pretty funny every time Amos mentions him as a big inspiration, since it's putting TJ on the spot. Would it be a good idea for TJ to condemn pedophilia, or would that just cause Amos to make a response video to him? I love the disaster factor of being associated with Amos. Logicked was recently brought up as some sort of accomplice for even having supported his asylum previously to his pro-pedo videos, despite Logicked having condemned Amos later on. ...and while Amos ponders what topic will get him the most views, in quite a cynical way, I think it's the above disaster factor that is the common theme of his videos, that is his successful brand. He's good at "trolling" people with unpopular views, and then backing them up with facts so that people can't refute them. He's like TJ on crack.
Amos has once again stopped approving YouTube comments, by the way. I wish he'd make up his mind. He's allowing the FreeSpeechTube comments.
Hilltop Knowledge2 has come out as another supporter for Amos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMoB9H6Exxk At first he seems reasonable enough - "Be careful when having sex with kids." - but then he starts talking about how his different personalities has different opinions on the matter, and can't quite agree. I dunno: Maybe you could have left that part out, and just say that you're comflicted on the subject?
I mean come on, guys. Do I need to lay down some ground rules here? If you're going to advocate for something - ANYTHING - it may sound better if you're NOT also sounding like a complete lunatic. I don't care if you ARE a lunatic, but could you at least TRY to sound like you're rational, and save your headmates for another video? ...or is that too hard for you? Is this the best you can do?
so #pedosexual rights took off after all?
>>7605 To answer that: Yes, that is the best that Mr. Hilltop can do. This guy has apparently established a whole 150 abbreviated principles (so far), that he's trying to balance around in his head. ...but maybe he's a super genius or something - who knows? It's hard to judge from only two videos. It's just that the Amos video was the sanest SOUNDING one.
Amos just made a new video: "How to be an Effective Pedophile Activist Part 1" https://www.freespeechtube.org/v/10jd
In the video, Amos lays down HIS ground rules for being an effective activist: 1. Aim for a mass audience. This means using the plainest vocabulary possible, so that the most possible people will be able to understand you, but it also means switching to a vlog format, or at least sticking to popular platforms. 2. Making an effective point. This means being concise, clear and inspiring, but also to provide and refer to examples.
From his blameing language, I don't think Amos gets why there are no pro-pedo blogs on popular sites: They've all been banned. Anti-pedos will typically swarm upon any pro-pedos they discover, like somebody has shat in their pool, and reee non-stop until the site owner just wants all the noise to stop. I know this from personal experience, with the owner of a Blogger-sized platform directly telling me that my blog was endangering the site's very existence. This was from just one single blog post, and this is just one of numerous examples of me being banned from various platforms, quote, "without discussion". If it wasn't for these spineless site owners caving for the populism that Amos thinks is going to save the pedos, they would already have their rights back.
Amos also mentions other pedo-supporters, that I think look decent: - Jenn ( https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnHdTKgj0SZt3GeAoug1jLQ/videos ) - Cartograph ( https://twitter.com/MAP_Cartograph/ ) - The Savannah Ape ( https://www.youtube.com/user/YuenHsiaoTieng/videos?view_as=subscriber https://twitter.com/thesavannahape?lang=en )
In a way Amos is lucky living in easier times where there are free speech platforms sturdy enough to keep him on, and the internet is big enough to host such a vast number of people that ideas doesn't matter. In my days, just existing as a pedo on a site, could end in you getting a letter from your ISP - the ONLY ISP at the time - that if you wouldn't stop making users on certain platforms, that they wouldn't have me as a customer. That would mean no internet for you, if you didn't keep quiet as a mouse. ...so I really think it's unfair that Amos - being somewhat of a star of consequence - looks down and judges lesser people for not being able to do what he's done through sheer defiance, by relentlessly making new accounts.
To put it in perspective: I'm even surprised that Amos isn't living under a bridge as his only allowed residence, because that's what happens to some pedos in the US, who weren't granted political asylum: They're not allowed to live anywhere, because "anywhere" "isn't far enough away from a school". ...and so just 5-10 years ago, there has been a huge FRONT of just pedophile refugees, within the US, moving from state to state, looking for a place where they would be allowed to stay and live, and they weren't regarded with sympathies, but as a threat. Amos is a pretty cool person, but what is his saving grace, is actually his asylum: It would look extremely bad if a US asylum just entailed being homeless in the streets.
Maybe if Amos creates a youtube channel where he talks about his topics in a more moderate way and with better presentation/editing, he can ease his way into youtube overtime. Uploading videos that look homemade and screeching pedophilia will quickly scare anyone. Get a proper background to his videos, a watermark, and be more moderate with the content and he could probably stay on youtube longterm.
Meanwhile, the complete maniac known as Areum Ling Kaiya / Stetson Hardwick, has been making increasingly hostile videos, the most recent showing global nuclear war images while saying that an anti-pedo, and all conservatives, must be stopped at all costs. I'm sure global thermonuclear war, will be a great campaign point. If "Areum" and his so called "corporation" name, is anything to go by, I don't even think he's a US citizen, so good luck being a US president, you wierdo. (Pic is from his video.)
>>7614 >Uploading videos that look homemade and screeching pedophilia will quickly scare anyone. Amos got famous for such things as literally humping religious texts. This gung ho way is the Amos way, and if there's another - less shocking - way, it would just sink him into obscurity.
You may wonder where part 2 of Amos's latest video is. Amos said that he would link it in the description, but there's no link there. Well, whether he's ever going to upload part 2 or not, he's now uploaded both parts as one video, over on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2uLiC00uJ4k ("Part 2" starts at 6:45.)
Amos's principles - part 2: 2-2. Know your audience. Some people are more rational than others, and so some people will respond more to logic and research, while other people will require emotional arguments in order to be convinced. 3. Analyze / Self-reflect Always strive to improve your content.
This part very clearly brings up the issue of taking the high road, versus taking the low road. It's like this: You can help improving the world in two ways: You can become a worker at a sewage treatment plant, where you aim to heroically and personally fondle tons of feces with your two hands. ...or you can become a city planner, where you stay clear of any feces, and work on top-down rulings over treatment plants and sewage systems. Both ways deal in handling every single piece of feces, but the first in the low road, and the second is the high road. ...and here's the thing: If you're a sewage worker, you're not a city planner. Nobody in the city council is going to listen to you, because all you do all day, is fondle feces up close. Once you begin to take the low road, the high road will become lost to you. Once you set your sights on just trying to debate every single retard on YouTube, one at a time, instead of appealing to government principles, you've narrowed your playing field to losing forever. That's when you've become a YouTuber, deep in the shit of the world, far away from actual academia, and the most that you'll ever be, is Sargon of Akkad.
It's clear that his faux debate with Combat Wombat, has had a lasting negative influence on Amos. His inability to convince CW, and his defence of "I'm thick as a brick, and I'm getting paid for it.", has frustrated Amos to the degree that he's now willing to compromize his intellectual honesty, which is the one thing that he's got going for him. CW went "Talk to my asshole, Amos." and Amos was like "I'm going to need a bigger spoon for this - hold on...". This is the folly of leftists: They care about the little guy, and so they don't see the forest for the trees. They don't know when to ignore people, because everybody is important somehow. This is why fascism will always be superior. You can probably convince Combat Wombat, but that's going to take a baseball bat. That's how low you have to go, in order to get CW to see things your way. You can't argue with brain damage, or somebody who's not even looking to be convinced in the first place. CW's argument is that he can sit safely in his chair, somewhere in a basement, and get paid for it, and that's it. He is a piece of feces best left to rot. He has zero intellectual honesty, but more importantly, he is of no consequence, and shouldn't be of any consequence, and his entire mission in life, is to be of some kind of consequence, so giving him any amount of time, will only be his victory - not yours.
By being "emotionally convincing", there's also the folly of trying to impose your paraphilia on others, like the transsexuals are doing. Since you can't convert people into pedophiles, you're just exposing them to things that they find gross, leading to them being grossed out, and finding you to be annoying and imposing. Thus it will have the opposite effect. This is the greatest folly of the whole rainbow flag community, and if pedos can avoid stepping on people's balls like that, they'll be way ahead of all the other paraphilias, in hopes of gaining rights.
Amos mentions "MAPs irl Podcast": https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFs6WXQMMmAq0XXQ0ty0Pdw https://twitter.com/maps_irl?lang=en While Amos brings them up was an example of boring and uninteresting podcasts, you might have a different taste, so if you have time to spare, you could check them out. They sell merch. :)
>>7622 The sell t-shirts as well, if you're looking for that final instrument in your plan to create your own IRL streetfight beat-'em-up.
Does Amos browse enrive?
Hardwick is now claiming that Amos is his boyfriend. Congratulations, Amos. I hope Hardwick is able to give consent.
>>7624 Don't know. I told him about this thread in the YouTube comments, but who knows if he ever reads those, since they're set to approval only. I also think that this is too much text for him to read. It would just bore him.
Part 2 of "How to be an Effective Pedophile Activist Part 2" is finally up on FreeSpeechTube. ( https://www.freespeechtube.org/v/10jv ) More importantly, Amos has acquired himself a new gmail: firstname.lastname@example.org Feel free to contact him. I've been hearing that he likes people who "are cool enough", whatever that means.
New video: "Why Pedophiles Shouldn't be so Fearful" https://www.freespeechtube.org/v/10ks
I don't agree with this video one bit. I think Amos lacks the ability to feel fear in the first place, which doesn't exactly make him an expert on this subject to begin with. I'd also call him inexperienced, but that just is'nt the case. He knows himself how hard it is to stay on YouTube and Twitter, et cetera, via multiple accounts, for just defending these things. In Singapore he's gotten physically attacked in public at least twice, the police have raided his home, and he's been to prison over thoughtcrimes, but somehow he must think that pedophilia would be less of an issue in the West, despite people being fired from jobs over such things, along with all the other things I've brought up previously. I also think that you just can't be paranoid enough when it comes to the internet and internet connected devices, whether you're a pedo or not. When Tumblr was forced to reveal just how much data mining was going on of their users, they revealed not one, not ten, but hundreds of little digital brain parasites, that were apparently mandatory to even browse the site. If your date is smart, she'll look up at least your basic income, which is by default available online. Windows is siphoning a worrying amount of encrypted user data. I could go on, but the list would take days to even type. ...but Amos doesn't want pedos to fear, for some reason. Again I'm questioning whether he's being sincere. At the very least, I think he just want more people to openly join his movement, even at the cost of their own security.
ForNoGoodReason is back with his Brie accusations: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vD7GZvJeovc ...or maybe it's spelled "Bri" - who knows? FNGR insists on spelling it Bri, so maybe it's some sort of Scandinavian spelling or something.
I'm still watching the video, but so far he's presented a screenshot and a video, clearly showing that Amos was aware that she was 14 from the very beginning. Screenshots and videos can still be doctored, but Amos is now left with proving if it's fake or not. Keep in mind that it took FNGR over two months to get back to this, and one has to ask what was taking so long. Two months is plenty of time to fake a chatroom that would look good on video. Ultimately none of this matters if no charges are filed, et cetera, so Amos doesn't have to do or prove shit, but it's going to look pretty bad if he doesn't dispel these rumours.
Once again I want to bring up that if you're going to be an activist, for anything, then take note of how not to do things: - Do not get into "close families" (as Amos is shown describing his server) on chatrooms like Discord. Social bonding with recorded histories, will eventually invite fallouts, betrayals, infiltrations from seductive spies, et cetera. Even if Amos would have kept things clean, even so much as private photos of his sock drawer, can be used against him. Don't get personal on the internet, and don't mix it with your activism. - Try to act as an example. Don't both argue that pedos are harmless, and then go be a harmful pedo, because people scoff at "Do as I say - don't do as I do.". Yes, people will stalk you for years, trying to get you to trip up, but it didn't really seem to take that much, to get Amos to trip up: From YouTube he went straight to social bonding on Discord, to welcoming children, and then having relations with them, and at no point is he even cautious. - If caught, it's understandable to lie and deny, but any lies that you're then caught with having made, will ruin your reputation as an honest person. You're always going to be suspected of presenting your activism data with a bias.
According to FNGR, Bri denies having an adult boyfriend, and with that denial, the focus is back on Amos. Bri could have been lying about having had an adult boyfriend in the first place, or maybe the "boyfriend" was her next target. At 8:45, FNGR explains there being no charges, with that Bri has to actually file those charges herself, and so Bri is upset, but apparently not TOO upset. Either that, or she's involved in too much illegal shit herself, to back up her statements. At the end of the video FNGR shows a whole cybersex log between "Lola"/Bri, that I'm good not watching. It's funny how in the chatlog, she promises Amos to never publicize the C6 logs as a form of revenge, while at the same time having open a tab to Reddit's "r/PettyRevenge" board. I'll say it again: Women are of the devil.
...but we've been told that Bri is just a phony name, so what's her real name? Well, as revealed in her own recording, the recorder's Windows account is closer to "misas", and since Bri is showed to show a picture of herself as being of hispanic complexion, and has claimed to be hispanic to Amos, it's probably more correct to call her "Misa S." or just "Misa", since that's a hispanic name.
It's been silent from Amos Yee for almost two weeks. This isn't that surprising, since he spoke about being burned out in one of his last videos, and he should take care and rest up. In the meantime, we could talk about how hard it is to find news about Amos. Both Google and Bing are censoring the fuck out of him. They'll rather talk about his adventures in Singapore, and mention Sargon and Metokur, even to this day. I've yet to find a reliable search engine that brings up any of his channels. It's worth mentioning that Google is allowing a few bot pages that update continuously, to serve as the first hit on a search restricted to recent updates only, so that's Google blatantly working with the bad guys to stifle free speech. Disgusting. I'm also curious whether Amos is ever going to talk about other topics. ...like the Hong Kong protests, or maybe even the climate crisis. ...because that would probably piss off his opponents the most: Him taking his "dirty hands" and smearing them all over popular topics, "acting as if he's not just a filthy pedophile". Was Richard Huckle framed? that's another topic that he could talk about. Personally I'm glad I get a vacation too, from reporting on him several times a week.
This guy will never reach any audience. He is not on any normie social media. Not on facebook, not on youtube, not on twitter, not on instagram, not even on 4chan. He will fade into complete obscurity.
>>7640 >This guy will never reach any audience. To date his wiki article has 218 references from various headlines and articles. ...and he is on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCPXiH4Y8tWPc6lLHyrYmQaA/videos However, it doesn't matter if normies know of him. WE still know of him, and that's good enough for now. The rest is up to his persistence, charisma and savviness. With enough of that, it won't matter if you get banned five times: If you just keep making accounts and videos, and you keep having a smart off-site archive, then you're destined for fame/infamy. People can try to ignore you all they want - you'll still have an audience. PewDiePie got to where he was just by clickbaiting for years, and Amos has topic-baiting talents, so I think he might make it. Still think it's a dumb idea to aim for the faint chance of making a career out of YouTube, but activism is something that you do whether you can make money off of it, or not.