Enrive[ a / b / biz / c / co / g / gg / global / k / lit / Movies / mu / nsa / pc / pol / sci / toon / tv / x / ]

Politics - /pol/ [Catalog] [Board FAQ]

[New Thread]


OT

CAPTCHA Image

TopBottom

Image Thumbnail

I might take Enrive down temporarily, for some months to a year if interest in it remains this low. Since 2016, there were enough lurkers that the server costs were paying for itself with ads. So even if posting was low or we had no activity, I lost nothing by keeping us online. But at this moment, there are very few people browsing the site compared to what it used to be during 2014-2017 and ads only pay for 1/3 of the costs. It has gotten expensive to continue keeping us up when we have almost no posters, and when I have become so busy with my other business that I don't think I'll be able to code Enrive for a while. While I'll miss this place, there is no justification to keep it online if people are not interested in it, and it would be a better strategy to take it offline and only bring it back online in the future when I have finished coding it, or have more spare time and money to invest in it. If you like Enrive and want to support it and would prefer to keep it online, then help make the site grow at least a little. Doubling our Online Users to an 80 average should be enough that at least it is not a monetary burden on me any longer. I know that at least one person seems to be banned from every forum out there and Enrive is his only outlet, but due to the costs I may not be able to keep us up just for 1 or 2 people posting. Not with the world in the current monetary crisis it is. If I take us offline I will do so in 2 to 3 months. Enough time to mature the idea and I don't think I want to expend more money than that when I have been doing so for a year now. And just to be clear, it's not about the money, it is about the money + little interest on the website. The money I can save for not hosting us for a year may be much better spend re-hosting us in the future when the site is fully developed and where I can also put the time to work further on it.


51 replies and 20 media omitted.
>>
Image Thumbnail

47 пользователей онлайн


Image Thumbnail

With Amos Yee now being back, resparking the pedo rights movement, it's about time that his thread migrated from the /newchums/ board, to the more official /pol/. During his absence, Amos seems to have gotten his life in order, changed his stance on AOC to be at the age of four rather than at the age of 0, and apologized for banning people. Here's his channel, his new name being Kino: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCokZ_ShUOz-tBqJDdsF_WoA He also gets along well with his archive channel, which is easy to find. His opponents in the comment section - mostly nazis - are of course as frothing as ever, and fun to trigger and systematically report for hatespeech.


223 replies and 91 media omitted.
>>
Image Thumbnail

>>7668 Was Amos BANNED from FreeSpeechTube, or did he just grow sick and leave? There's evidence both for and against at this point. On one hand Norbert - the owner - has been reveal to be a ban-faggot ( https://enrive.org/b/thread/233439 ) but on the other hand Amos's one post at his Medium account, has been removed ( https://medium.com/@amosyee/stop-whining-about-being-a-pedophile-9b76074cd9d6 ). (The Medium account is still active, so I don't think it was removed by any mods.) His Baraag account is as intact as ever, but maybe he forgot it exists, or the login. Amos Yee - Man of Mystery. I don't think we'll hear from him again, at least for a long while.

>>
Image Thumbnail

With the world all going to shit now, I stopped paying attention to pedo rights for a few months, but it seems that Amos's "buddy" (intense activist and former fan) Youth Liberation, is also gone, deleting his main account (on FreeSpeechTube) on 26 January 2020. https://www.freespeechtube.org/v/10g7 https://www.instagram.com/isityourmind/ His disappearance isn't as suspicious, though: His name isn't scrubbed from search engines, and he's had a previous history of removing his own content and accounts. On 23 January 2020 FreeSpeechTube also got hit by a Search and Seizure from police, which probably spooked a lot of their members, regardless of them being anonymous or not. FreeSpeechTube owner Norbert had this to say: "Possibly related [to the search and seizure], Today is the second time that "Youth Liberation" deleted his account and (thus) all his content. First as Morphintous, and today as Worldstarhiphop (28 videos, text). Even when he's not deleting accounts, he has the tendency to manually delete his content. I see that user -wz- still has four of "Youth Liberation"'s videos. https://www.freespeechtube.org/?search_query=YL " - Source: https://www.freespeechtube.org/v/11dp/2725 The internet will be empty without these two. Who am I supposed to watch NOW? :.(

>>

>Who am I supposed to watch NOW? ...and don't tell me to go watch EQF-OLF or WarmPotato on that pretentious quasi-skeptic semi-PC FreeSpeechTube website, because they're seemingly just bringing up historical cases or other people. I want to watch one of those intellectuals who FreeSpeechTube bans, and hear their own ideas.

>>

>>7711 black people can be pedos too?

>>

>>7713 Judging by Lolibooru, hentai featuring a black guy making love to a child, is a bit overrepresented, actually. I'm surprised as well. I thought pedophilia was a white highculture thing.



Image Thumbnail

Red pill Thread


25 replies and 16 media omitted.
>>

Jews are just 1.4% of the US population and 0.0025% of the world population >Senate (9% jewish, 650% US over-representation) Michael Bennet (D-CO) Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) Benjamin Cardin (D-MD) Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) Jacky Rosen (D-NV) Brian Schatz (D-HI) Bernie Sanders (I-VT) Chuck Schumer (D-NY) Ron Wyden (D-OR)

>>

>House (8% jewish, 600% US over-representation) David Cicilline (D-RI) Stephen Cohen (D-TN) Susan Davis (D-CA) Ted Deutch (D-FL) Eliot Engel (D-NY) Lois Frankel (D-FL) Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ) David Kutsoff (R-TN) Andy Levin (D-MI) Mike Levin (D-CA) Alan Lowenthal (D-CA) Nita Lowey (D-NY) Elaine Luria (D-VA) Jerry Nadler (D-NY) Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) Dean Phillips (D-MN) Jamie Raskin (D-MD) Max Rose (D-NY) Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) Adam Schiff (D-CA) Kim Schrier (D-WA)

>>

Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) Brad Sherman (D-CA) Brad Schneider (D-IL) Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) Susan Wild (D-PA) John Yarmuth (D-KY) Lee Zeldin (R-NY) >Supreme Court (33.3% jewish, 2,400% US over-representation): Ruth Bader Ginsburg (D) Stephen Breyer (D) Elena Kagan (D)

>>

>>7706 >>7707 >>7708 Jewish superiority confirmed. B)

>>

>>7709 So just how are jews superior? Well, jews are altruistic, trustworthy, civilized, compassionate, and just. They are everything that you'd want from a good leader. The torah is a source of much wisdom and intelligence needed to rule well. ...and the overrepresentation that we're seeing, is proof of that: These leaders have been elected because they have demonstrated themselves to have all the above characteristics. ...so if you wish to become a great leader, then pick up the torah today. It has much to teach you.



Image Thumbnail

jewpill thread


22 replies and 16 media omitted.
>>
Image Thumbnail

>>
Image Thumbnail

>>
Image Thumbnail

>>
Image Thumbnail



Image Thumbnail

>UCLA researchers have found that it is possible to assess a person's ability to feel empathy by studying their brain activity while they are resting rather than while they are engaged in specific tasks. Setting aside the current limits or faults of current technology, give me ONE reason why passing empathy tests should not be mandatory for politicians. This is the real redpill. If we ensure our leaders are empathetic, the world only gets better.


0 replies and 0 media omitted.
>>
Image Thumbnail

yes, A true EMPATHY TEST WOULD CHANGE THE WORLD. THERE COULD BE BREEDING of high empathy people with each other . creating a ...better race of humans . we could sterilize low empathy people and out right sociopaths . this is not a joke , its a game changer . it could even become part of the "designer baby " tech that is coming soon. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Designer_baby. people would choose to have a high empathy baby

>>

>>7703 There is a catch though. Too much empathy but no self preservation also leads to someone who lets others take advantage of you. Leaders cannot be selfless all the time. A blend of empathy and self preservation (aka fairness) is needed. I don't know if we can measure that fairness yet, but starting with empathy at least gets corrupt and evil people out of the government

>>
Image Thumbnail

>>7704 yes , of course. the "new race' of high empathy folks would be Keenly aware of this and adjust as needed in any given situation . the most 'highly prized" people would be the" high empathetic-high intelligence" folks. (and this could someday be artistically selected for) by this time we almost certainly would have a/the AI Singularity. all of human decisions would be made by the people listed above and their AI counterpart .https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singularity it is the real, the true, the honest "Eugenics". We (HUMANS) have stolen Evolution away from nature ...and we will be better for it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singularity#Next_step_of_sociobiological_evolution



Image Thumbnail

I'm listening to some "alt right" (crypto-nazis) retards right now, and it seems that the way that these people make up their minds, is through sheer psychotic delusion: "Uh, I heard that there was some bombings going on in Iran, and that they bombed a lot of women and children and innocent civilians, but that among them happened to be a general who was very pro US, and so now everyone's upset. Uh, that's what I heard." They just make up stuff in their own heads like Donald Trump, and call it politics! It used to be that rightwing meant pro upper class, and leftwing went pro working class. Nowadays rightwing means being batshit crazy, while leftwing means being remotely sane. ...or it this just how retarded people in the US have become? Have they abandoned even Wikipedia now, and just turned to the crackpipe for wisdom? The United States used to be a country. It used to be something you could respect, even though all it did was invade countries whenever it saw fit. Yes, it was evil, but at least to contained some semblence of intelligence. At least these people weren't just a bunch of niggers. You're just a bunch of niggers now. You voted some psychotic idiot into power, you withdrew from the climate agreement, and you're about to wage yet another "war on terror" where you are the actual terrorists. ...and you're okay with that, because while some of you down in California have been literally on fire, you're not on fire right now, and so that means that everything is okay. You're just scum. You have no redeeming qualities. The entire world hates you, and wish that you'd just leave. Please go to the moon, all of you! Go to Mars! You can't stay here!


0 replies and 0 media omitted.
>>
Image Thumbnail

>>7673 9/11 was a mossad job



Image Thumbnail

Dear stormfags (assuming we even have that in a place as free as masterchan). When you say you are against 'degeneracy', it means you are in favor of doing what is 'natural'. Well, do I even have to explain myself further? Just look at the picture. If you want women to shave their armpits, you are being a degenerate. In your life you hardly ever do what is 'natural'. Don't use that as an excuse, it makes you look stupid as fuck.


67 replies and 18 media omitted.
>>
Image Thumbnail

>>7356 to get dubs >>7355 CHECKED!

>>
Image Thumbnail

>>7357 LMFAO!!! Okay now this is epic!!!

>>
Image Thumbnail

sometimes all a man can do is shit post

>>

>>4350 based nigger, it's not just about naturality, it's about human naturalism. It is natural for a woman to shave her armpits

>>
Media deleted

Enrive 💯



Image Thumbnail

The cause of all problems on this planet is not the Jews or any world government. It is not Illuminati or immigration. It is not any lizards or anything silly like that. It is psychopaths with the variation sociopaths and their followers; people with low intelligence. One way they make life more miserable for decent people is economically. A short and simple example follows. The big corporations are led by psychopaths. They pay bribes to US politicians and as they are corrupt to the bone they accept the bribes and follow the orders given by their overlords. These orders becomes laws. These laws are forced onto other countries by trade agreements. As the politicians in other countries have to low intelligence to understand the consequences of these laws they don't oppose them. The consequences are less competition in the markets, higher prices and a transfer of money from decent people to psychopaths. Some laws that has to be changed are the lengths of patents and copyrights. They should be much shorter. When a content creator dies the copyright should expire immediately. Collaborations should have a fixed, short expiration date. Anything else is nothing but stealing money from decent people. Banks are also stealing money from decent people. Why else would they have such good results. Salaries, inclusive bonuses, for executives should have a maximum level, they should not be allowed to steal money from decent people. Big pharma is also a scam, delivering inefficient drugs at atrocious prices. Drug research should be publicly financed and free of patents. Companies should compete on price and quality of the drugs they manufacture. The one percenters are psychopaths that succeeded in stealing money from decent people with the help of bribed or stupid politicians.


2 replies and 2 media omitted.
>>

>>7675 >When a content creator dies the copyright should expire immediately. >kill a content creator >can now use his content for free

>>
Image Thumbnail

1/2 While psychopathy is indeed the problem, there is a much better solution. Psychopaths used to be locked up in insane asylums for being an inherent danger to others. However, because of campaigning humanitarians, this isn't done anymore. (An example of such a campaign is the recommendation campaign that has been promoted by YouTube these recent years, of Jon Ronson's speech at TED talks ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYemnKEKx0c ) as well as the mandatory pushes for psychopathy in TV series' by claiming that psychopaths would make good business leaders, simply because they're so statistically frequent. (See the Red Dwarf episode Cured for a recent example.) Today you can easily scan the brain of a person and determine whether or not that brain is fully functional, or if large parts of it (such as the frontal lobe) is malfunctioning. After that, arguing that a psychopath has to commit a crime in order for him to prove that he needs to be locked up, is like saying that a child has to die for it to be considered unwise to have let it play in traffic, or even be let near a street unsupervised. The ways in which psychopaths pose a danger to their surroundings is inherent, continuous and permanent, and it's only in rare and extreme cases, that law enforcement will be able to prove that any illegal acts have been commited after the fact. In many cases somebody has to die, before they act.

>>

2/2 Just like children or disabled people, I do not wish harm upon psychopaths. I wouldn't call the intimate relationships I've had with them "functional" or "safe", but at least I know that evil people are people too. However, these people are in acute and dire need of supervision, and trying to ignore that, and just wait around for a murder to happen, either by them or in self-defense, is extremely irresponsible. These people need to be locked up in asylums, because having trained guardians supervising them around the clock, isn't feasible. If you want humane treatments, then make the asylums humane.

>>

>Don't listen to trolls and other lying idiots. >I will not return to this thread or read any comments. So you're a troll then. :P



Image Thumbnail

I want to do my own Amos Yee campaign thing now - I'm inspired. I want to be Amos Yee for an hour. Just allow people to have sex however they want. Fuck consent. Abolish it. Not just age of consent, but consent altogether. If you love somebody, and you want to show your love in some exotic way, then don't restrict yourself according to some taboo. Your preference matters. Just go for it: Rape with evil glee, if that's love to you. Torture. Kill. Whatever. Love is always a beautiful thing if shared. The rape laws right now are forbidding even people in a relationship to rape eachother in various ways. Dominance is considered "being abusive", et cetera. Some people want to eat the woman of their dreams, and some women would love to get eaten. Just go for it. Legalize everything, and everyone will be more fulfilled for it. Even if you first meet via a rape in an alley, that's okay. Women have tremendous rape orgasms from being forced - that's no secret - and when you have sex you learn to fit together, so why not as rapist and victim? Just rape her and then you can go get married and live happily ever after.


2 replies and 0 media omitted.
>>
Image Thumbnail

I think it's not just me who's had a crush on a celebrity like a movie star, where you genuinely love them, especially when acting. I should have the right to look them up, and - if need be - break into their house, and just love them. Paradoxically some movie stars are privately actually pretty lonely and unfulfilled, and would love for a real fan to really appreciate their work even intimately. As it is now, with all these bullshit laws, we're all being cucked on a global scale. She may not know you yet, but what kind of deranged asshole would turn down free love? She'll get to know you eventually, and making love to her while she's wearing her movie outfit, that's not just a start, but the best possible start. Don't feel ashamed - if you're jerking off to her, then you know it's the right thing to do. Abolish the consent laws. Make love bloom like never before.

>>

Zoe Quinn recently highlighted the issue of why abuse-shaming need to stop. She just drove a man to suicide from just publicly shaming him for being "abusive", whereupon he got fired from his job, et cetera. Keep in mind that Zoe clearly gets off on being abused. She'll suck cock for good reviews, she'll post her nudes online, and do all kinds of degrading studd, because she loves being a victim, since victims get respect and power. ...and so this guy was an ex whom Zoe had blamed for sexual abuse of her in the past, but it wasn't worse than that she had patched things up with him, gone to stay at his house, and got back to having sex with him. Her being a submissive, and him being dominant, they hit it off and started with power dynamics. She could leave at any time, but she "wasn't allowed to", and Zoe obeyed. She obeyed because she loved when this guy dragged her around by her pussy, and the pain that came with it, because she loves being used. She loved to be mentally destroyed by somebody else, and reduced to a victim. ...and that's okay.

>>

However, Zoe couldn't bare the shame of wanting to be a victim. Among her feminist friends she was supposed to have dignity and demand respect. ...and so over time they guilted her - directly or indirectly - into blaming "her abuser" as a bad guy - somebody to abuse in turn, and whom women should beware and avoid. Zoe doesn't understand that most women love to be abused and victimized as much as she did, and so that's why she thought that he must be dangerous to other women. This second intimate betrayal, paired with him being ostracized and persecuted, proved to be too much for the guy. This wouldn't have happened if the consent laws were abolished. Then Zoe's invented blame would have meant nothing, and she would have had nothing to feel ashamed for. Consent laws ruin relationships in this way, and they ruin lives. Now Zoe will seek new guys to seduce into dominance, which she will then feel guilty about, and she will later betray.

>>
Image Thumbnail

There may be some male exceptions, but generally speaking women are physically made to be receptacles for passion, the strength of that passion being how mercilessly they can be forced. Consent laws weren't made for women. They were made for men, in hopes of safeguarding "htier" women from rivaling men. Consent laws only hurt women. If you don't want a complete abolishing, the laws can be changed so that only too rough sex can be made illegal: Sex which results in vaginismus and scars, and severe bodily injury, and with some degree of love behind it. Just rape whomever you want, as long as you do it responsibly and don't dump her afterwards. Rape to keep, especially if you cum inside.

>>
Image Thumbnail

my 7 yr old niece is a horny jack rabbit its crazy she grinds on my leg playing horsey , i dont know what to do im not going to call her out to make her feel bad or uncomfortable, if consent was not around we could openly discuss what she was doing or why, but as it is if i say anything it could be considered grooming or some other bullshit legalize term. so i stay away from her now which is a shame i really like her and im afraid she is the one who will be a victim to normy delusion. of age and right and wrong.



Image Thumbnail

If the latest decades have shown us anything, it's that freedom and American values, is a horrible thing. People are just feeling free to ruin themselves left, right and center, when they really just belong in concentration camps. People think they have the birthright to speak too, thinking that if people are convinced into doing bad things, by carefully worded propaganda, that it's just their fault if they fell for it. I think that should go back to the feudal system, where the right to speak and do things, was EARNED. In the olden times this meant loyal service to the king, but in the modern times this means things like having graduated from a proper education. If you have a degree in chemistry, then you are allowed to speak of things related to chemistry, while having no education, means that you should know your place and keep silent. The same goes for the right to vote: This should be reserved only to people with some kind of degree in politics. We could invent a whole new school subject called "Voting". Human rights is a horrible philosophy, and anybody advocating for most of these, have not met any commoners. Commoners are uneducated, crazy, psychopathic bastards, who do good only by accident, and they need to either be firmly controlled, or erradicated. These people are crazy, especially in large numbers, and the only reason they've gotten rights to begin with, is because of this very reason, and the ruling class' unwillingness to resort to enough violent measure in response.


0 replies and 0 media omitted.
>>

We need to stop rejecting fascist oppression as something blanket bad, and instead start to figure out how good fascist oppression looks like. There is a way to oppress responsibly. For example, oppressing pedophiles, or murderers and rapists, is bad, while oppressing psychopaths and nazis, is good. The whole idea of society is based on the oppression of psychopaths, and the whole idea of the enlightenment, is based on the oppression of the stupid peasantry and the church. ...so what I'd like to see, is countries taking their oppression seriously, and really justify their reasoning behind it, because a lot of the oppression I'm seeing, feels kind of arbitrary and poorly thought out. Also, the Iustitian system needs to be replaced. We can't just go around judging people based on their actions - that system doesn't really work. We need to judge people based on who they ARE instead. Put homeless people in prison and only let out those who have gotten an education or otherwise proven themselves, for example. We can't go on like this. We can't have insane people propagate that a nazi has as much of a right to speak as a decent person. That's how you end up with Donald Trump, among lots of other things.



Image Thumbnail

"Edward Brongersma (31 August 1911 in Haarlem, Netherlands – 22 April 1998 in Bloemendaal/Overveen, Netherlands) was a Dutch politician and doctor of law. For a number of years he was a member of the Dutch Senate for the Labour Party, and chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. He was primarily known for pedophilia advocacy and as an advocate of more lax legislation on public morality." - Wikipedia He's a clip of him, courtesy of Youth Liberation: https://www.freespeechtube.org/v/100V


0 replies and 0 media omitted.


Image Thumbnail

https://16chan.xyz/pol/res/17065.html LIVE: Yellow Vests protesters join strike in Paris https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gi1dpUl9buQ Yellow Vests protesters march in Paris https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MldSUAByjuA Protesting again live right now. Get in here, lads. Post red pills in the live chats.


0 replies and 0 media omitted.
>>
Image Thumbnail



Image Thumbnail

Scoop: Trump suggested nuking hurricanes to stop them from hitting U.S. Source: https://www.axios.com/trump-nuclear-bombs-hurricanes-97231f38-2394-4120-a3fa-8c9cf0e3f51c.html?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=organic (I don't have anything to add. Vote Trump 2020.)


0 replies and 0 media omitted.


Image Thumbnail

Angel here. As a perfect immortal, it is my right to rule. Let me tell you how I would usher you into a new era. Directly underneath me I would appoint generals with high-functioning brains, to govern you wisely with the stern hand of military might. My halls of government would be made clean and pristine, answering to the heavenly standard of obediance rather than freedom. I would do away with all the unspeakable filth of democracy - humanity and it's "rights", has shown what it's good for, and I think we can soar much, much higher. I would silence the voices of the wicked and the disabled mongrels, to let only the select caste of the worthy enlightened ones ring out, so that you may obey my guidance more willingly. There will be no more "tolerance" of wrong-think - only humble obedience to my divine word. For example, there will be no more religion, except the one true religion with me as your messenger. Heretics will of course be imprisoned, and if the prisons are full, then I guess we will just have to exterminate you to make room for better people. I give you my word that the concentration camps that I'll create, will be as huge as economically possible. They will house proper reeducation programs, where in the wicked and unintelligent, will learn to kneel before me, or die in mass graves. It all starts with you recognizing my splendor as an immortal, perfect being. You need me to rule you. Once I have cleansed you, you will become truly beautiful. Kneel before me.


2 replies and 2 media omitted.
>>
Image Thumbnail

Understand that I'm only entertaining the idea of camps as a "humane" alternative to immediate execution. Running such huge facilities will be costly, though, even with the workers inside maintaining it. ...but I have an idea for additional financing: We could sell it to you as a form of entertainment. We can host gameshows, where we put prisoners in death traps, and have them display some redeeming qualities in order to live. For example, we could put their fingers in a vice, and have them solve ten mathematical equations in order to keep them. ...or maybe express their most heartfelt praises to me. If they fail, their screams will be accompanied with laugh tracks. These gameshows will demonstrate exactly why they're in these camps: Because of their silly inferiority. Maybe we'll even release a reeducated winner each year.

>>
Image Thumbnail

...and you may be asking "When, oh Exalted One, will humanity be finally cleansed into your image? When will there finally be no more need for costly extermination camps?" and to that I say "Possibly never.". Think of it as gardening: A bush will always need tending to where branches will need to be trimmed away. Pray that I will never give up on you, humanity - that my patience with you will be endless. See, humanity is prone to defects. You mutate. You fail. You degenerate. You need upkeep to maintain yourselves, and my breeders will also need living space to breed their superior offspring in. However, once the initial cleasing is complete, the extermination will diminish into managable levels. If you want an estimated figure, then fine: 6.6 billions. That's the minimum amount of people that I predict we'll need to do away with. Compare that to the mere 17 million of the FIRST holocaust. Imagine 6.6 billion gloriously obediant people replacing them. Wouldn't that be something?

>>
Image Thumbnail

I am so filled with love, my subjects. The lengths I am willing to suffer through, just to see you cleansed of your imperfections... When I see you struggle, it just breaks my pure little heart. I hope you understand - if you can - that I know what's best for you, and if you're on my death list, that it's for the best: Know your obsolescence - that your death will serve as part of the beauty that will allow a more intelligent being to replace you. I will always kill you with outmost love in my heart.

>>

Oh how intensely my love burns for you. I need you to achieve, fat-brains. I need you to comprehend. I need you to function properly. There is so much work to be done, but with you pinned under my boot, we'll get there. ...eventually. I need to exercise patience. Deep breaths.

>>
Image Thumbnail

Once I have assumed my rightful place upon the throne - yes, I like thrones - we will begin thusly: After we've built the camps, we will begin screening the schools for both psychopathy and stupidity, but we will only abduct the dumbest (screened for by IQ tests), and the poorest of psychopaths (screened for by brain scans), since this will create the least fuss. The camps will be humane at first, since they won't be able to house as many. The prisoners may be put to work on expanding their camps, which I'm sure they'll be happy to do. Then, if we get a surplus of space, we can always raise the bars accordingly. Once the camps become financially draining, we'll lower the living conditions. We'll cite an overpopulation crisis, saying that it's either them or us. Then the genocide can finally be sanctioned. We could just mix them with people with incurable diseases, and let them become a leper colony. With a careful quarantine, that would get rid of those diseases at the same time. See, I'd love to have the patience for simply separating the men from the women and let them slowly die out in there, but it's just not feasible with the huge world population boom. We need to take these drastic measures before you all go extinct. We need to keep the population at least level, which means exterminating 83 million humans globally each year in order to save the planet. ...or they'll consume all our food, et cetera.



Image Thumbnail

As of the childporn censorship wasn't stupid enough, now countries want to censor terror propaganda as well. I'm fine with propaganda being pushed off of sites like YouTube, where it's spread to radicalize children and to make money. That's not legislation - that's just a site keeping itself clean and child friendly. Making it a crime like in New Zeeland - however - is just horrible. It's brainwash. It's going "Think freely within our terms. Don't find out what's beyond this point.". It's closing a surrounding debate. It's closing knowing consequences. After a ban, people are just free to make up stories about anything - good or bad. People can watch terror propaganda without becoming terrorists. I've read every terrorist manifesto I could get a hold of, because I have this burning need to find out what the fuck went on in these people's heads. I need to know the insanity. ...and all the time I've been open to the possibility that people like Breivik, were right all along, and I've never once thought that these people were sane and right. ...and if I can't verify this, then I have no real idea if those people were fighting some kind of just cause that I just didn't know about. ...and my point is that there is a choice. Unless you're part of some kind of social cult, you have a clear choice to educate yourself to the truth, or just blindly believe terror propaganda. Becoming radicalized from manifestos is on you. You can't point at a manifesto and say "It made me do it. It radicalized me and I was so helpless against its seductive powers.". Censoring childporn was already a mistake too many. Don't make another one. China is not a role model.


0 replies and 0 media omitted.
>>

If countries start banning terror propaganda, and people bring it up shootings with me, then I'm just going to go "Well, they probably had a good reason for it. You can't prove that they didn't.". That's just being rational: If somebody believes in something so surely, that they're willing to stake their lives on it, then the burden of proof falls on the people claiming that such a person did it for no reason at all. That's the society that governments want to create now: Of people who are not allowed to think critically for themselves. They want a loyal population - not an intelligent one.

>>

...and bans always seem to be preceeded by irrational bullshit. An example is people like The Amazing Atheist emotionally arguing "This shooter was such a coward that he had to kill people.". No, shooters and terrorists are the opposite of cowards. Shooters are much, much braver people than you social media watchers are, prepared to sacrifice their lives for a cause, irrational or not, needed or not. If emotional arguments and demeaning caricatures, is the best thing that you can come up with, then just shut your mouth. You're trying to make people stop thinking rationally, so that there will be no critical thinking left when it comes to reading propaganda. That's when a ban is instead put in place, because people and then either emotionally for or against terrorism. This is how people like TJ Kirk de facto contributes to irrationality, terrorism and censorship.

>>
Image Thumbnail

...and I want you to think about something: There's some very violent terror propaganda in the making right now, where people blow up power plants and cause countless civilian deaths because they think that the government is evil and a threat to the planet, civilians be damned. Fuck voting! Fuck politics - they're going in with guns and bombs. Just look at that man. That man is a terrorist, and that game is pure terror propaganda. That game should be banned under a censorship law.



Image Thumbnail

Why would he shill for bernie? Why someone known for exposing a government not respecting its citizens applaud some guy that has never said anything about protecting people's privacy in the digital age and doesn't even know how to turn on a computer? This tweet felt off to me. Off topic thread because shitpost


0 replies and 0 media omitted.
>>

>>7629 Tell me of a candidate who's remotely into protecting people's privacy.



Image Thumbnail

In this thread we discuss how Trump didn't do nothing, because Obama did it. ...and how jews run everything, and how that's somehow the end of the world, "the world" being the nazi third reich, which officially ended in 1945, but that's just jewish propaganda. You gotta understand: The only safe space to be that is left, is inside your own head. Your imagination will never fail you, and if it tells you that the space jews are coming, you need to trust your intuition, along with any site that you can find online that can validate your conclusions. "Paranoid schizophrenia" isn't a thing. That's just more jewish propaganda. They're everywhere, and Trump is innocent because Obama did it - fucking stellar logic. In short, this is a containment thread for the nazi spammer. If you have anything to rant about, I'll just refer you here, where you belong. This is my final solution for you. Enjoy.


0 replies and 0 media omitted.
>>

>What did you mean by this? >Do you have a problem with legal immigration? Prove that it's legal. Maybe on this board, somebody will care about that. (Hint: Not me, though.) >More reddit soacing >Are you a potato? >I cant wait until summer ends.. Yes, I am a sentient potato. A sentient jewish potato from the planet Reddit, who will die come winter. Pray for winter.

>>

Also, I just found out that calling new paragraphs "Reddit spacing" is actually a thing among 4channers, and I can't stop laughing. Looking forward to driving you insane by just writing legible stuff. Welcome to Reddit, biatch.

>>

>it's really funny that you call Jews pacifist when Israel is in a perpetual state of war since its inception and every year they commit countless war crimes in order to preserve their state. Israel is not representative of judaism. It is a corrupt, warmongering country run by Benjamin Netanyahu, who uses judaism as war propaganda. Jews are in open opposition to him, and corruption charges are being brought against him as we speak. >If Israelis are pacifist to you, then I guess you should consider Hitler a pacifist too, since he was just trying top preserve the existence of Germany. I also separate Israel from Israelis. Many jews move to Israel because it offers good living conditions. The atrocities and genocide commited by the country, is sort of an afterthought. That's a selfish approach, but it's not a will to go to war.



Image Thumbnail

Thread for hate to mexican feminazis Yesterday they destoyed the memecity again Odio a esas puta.


0 replies and 0 media omitted.
>>

>>7598 what happenned



Image Thumbnail

grab my pussy ! The most recent findings indicate that woman voted for trump in much larger numbers then anyone suspected, they have learned that his popularity with woman WENT UP after the pussy grabbing comment. Woman didnt vote for trump DESPITE the pussy comment; they voted for him BECAUSE of the pussy comment. It made him attractive to woman The magnitude of this is staggering .


8 replies and 2 media omitted.
>>

>>7413 >ok, im gonna explain politics to you fagots Not with that spelling, you won't. Reality check: You spell like a ten year old. If you went anywhere NEAR a politician, they'd kick you out for being illiterate. Even fucking Donald Trump spells better than you do. ...and you're going to explain politics to us? How about you finish basic education first? How about you learn to spell your own name? ...or learn about how to begin or end a simple sentence? ...you fucking delusional lunatic.

>>
Image Thumbnail

>>7414 >reddit spacing TOP KEK

>>

>>7415 >im gonna explain politics to you fagots >I don't know what a paragraph is. Typical American voter.

>>

>let me ecspluin p,ollioitcss too u gyuz.zz >lul reddit punctuasion i winn



Image Thumbnail

the only good presd. in modern times was jimmy carter. most of you are to young to know it but , he was the politician that hated politics. he was the president that hated being president . he was a good person... so he was a sucky politician. thats what makes him the best.


0 replies and 0 media omitted.
>>

Career politicians need to go. Every country should follow in the steps of other countries where you get no remuneration for running for government

>>
Image Thumbnail

>>7349 Do you believe in term limits? In the US, this has been brought up a time or two, but change isn't always good. Getting rid of someone that knows what they're doing and replacing them with someone that is new, but doesn't know what they're doing isn't such a good idea. This election we need a red wave, then we need to work on electing those that are against AIPAC, only then can we start putting America First. https://davidduke.com/zio-control-us-congress-depend-number-jews-elected/

>>

>>7350 this election...red wave...Pppffff... gonna be a small blue wave , maybe get rid of ted cruz. and some others. gonna be good.