Image spoilers when? I personally hate them, but its still a fun feature when trolling. I think it would be wonderful for all new users with less then 100 posts to have there image spoiled automaticly, with an option to unspoil all thumbnails. That way when we get flooded with CP spam, it will be just a bunch of spoilered thumbnails until moderation. For users like me that hate spoilers and won't click them, I will just check the box that unspoiles all thumbnails. Everybody wins. execpt spammer
What happened to Outlanders?
>>6707 They all died in the great war, didn't you read the memo?
>>6584 when it was the pedos board of masterchan it was epic the memes the raids the class. chummery will never be the same. normies fuk everything up.
>>7400 Dubs=Truth Even tho the Normie's won the war
>>7402 sad times.indeed
I mentioned that imgchili links weren't spam itt: https://ccluster.com/b/thread/228328 I searched google for "Tanya mix site:ccluster.com" To see if those posts still existed or if they were deleted.. I clicked on the first google result >pic related
>>7353 Everything looks the same asides from the address bar saying dangerous instead of secure, and the reply box/link is missing. Also the report/delete box is missing... Almost reminds me of what Ccluster looks like when you click on a link from somewhere else, and get caught in the curious.wtf loop
>>7354 That was it, curious.wtf I clicked on the first pic and a new tab opened. I got the same screen though, with the warning about ooep.co But it says curious.wtf in the address bar..
>>7355 when I click on viewsource scroll down to the bottom I see a link to ooep.co When I shut off ad block plus and reload page Click on an image, I get brought to another tab It says its dangerous too, after clicking visit this unsafe site It finally brings me to a linkbucks screen Then after clicking on 'skip this ad' I finally get the image I clicked on. So it's working as designed and ooep.co is something to do with the linkbucks thing and google has decided that ooep.co a dangerous
>>7350 tl;dr: This whole thread is pointless I forgot to copy and paste links from google into the address bar Got caught in the curious.wtf loop The red dangerous screen is because google has blacklisted ooep.co Which is a linkbucks domain At first I thought something was wrong with ccluster, there isn't lol
>>7357 All is not lost here Gad, you need to change up the way curious.wtf works As having a ooep.co link in the code will cause chrome/chromium to block it. Then again, if "Protect you and your device from dangerous sites" was disabled, I wouldn't of got that screen.
Feature request: image spoilers
>>7444 You should do it since I got trips m8 Also efnable mp4 support I know I can just rename my webm files to mp4 and upload them, but shitty browsers (firefox), won't play them like chromium will..
Hey cock smooch, r9k filter when? The spammer is literally copy/paste, The same fucking post dozens of times in a row. Either pull the plug or give a fuck nig nog..
>>7323 Report helps, but I guess it's easier to whine about it, eh?
>>7324 Spam filters help too when they're utilized
>>7329 They are tons of them, it takes about 12 hours to circumvent them. In the end of the day it's one guy that apparently has no life and all he does is spam (I'm presuming this and other sites). People posts things and just ignore the spam, I do what I can while I'm on line which is not 24/7 so spam happens. AFAIK there's one other guy reporting, he's a big help and I can tell when he's on or not, if the other 3 would help too it would be almost impossible for the spammer to trash the site, but again... it's easier to whine about it.
>>7330 I could report the spam but since Gad decided to ignore this place, I don't see the point anymore. This place is just another dead chan now
>>7341 >I could report the spam but Yeah, whine is easier.
Why don't you respond to anybody anymore?
>>6633 you ... do... not... watch the show... ...fagot
>>7229 Replying to a 4 month old post TOP KEK
>>7230 If you're topkeking for that... you need help chum... Real fast
B r i n g B a c k O u t l a n d e r s N i g g e r
The reports page automatically purges posts to Gads report page after 24 hours.
>>7078 I think it's every 48. Let's do a test, report this post of mine and let's see.
>>7079 Cue to Gad trolling everyone with inconsistent purges
Gads not dead.
>>7121 Of course he's not. His species is inmortal.
Can't you guys change the captcha to the cuckchani one? The cripplechani-like captcha is tedious and annoying.
>>7441 google catpcha spies on people, so no Create an anonymous ID and once you have a few posts with it you no longer need to type the captcha
>install sypware goyim YOU HAVE TO GO BACK
>https://ccluster.com/?c&m&p&t&o&of=249&MasterChanUser=9gpsrriebe4hlr5e20rrigc477 >https://ccluster.com/media/thumbs/candy_35555.jpg Image exists but not the thread its from? >https://ccluster.com/candy/thread/35033#35555
Thanks for reporting my post i appreciate it ??????????????????????????????????????????????/
>>6961 It's still there, I guess Gad will restore it when he reviews the reports. I've no clue why it was reported, though.
>>6963 They thought they'd be smart and report it to get an answer but that never works out and it didn't either this time >>6960
>>6969 Probably a new guy, the regulars (all 5 of us) wouldn't do something that stupid. Although... if a regular want's to pretend to be a noob that would be a good way to do it.
Can you do something about false reports? Since you disabled Gmods from seeing who is abusing the report feature recklessly, perhaps to censor users, the amount of false reports has skyrocketed. Always dismissed too. I'm pretty sure its the same user that always gets called out, but only you know for sure.
>>6830 >volunteer btw
20 posts really is a lot when it's this dead. Wish I had my old account..
>>6943 post your account name, and Ill donate you 20 posts. Or goto /test/ and make 20 one letter/number posts, they can even be the same, no filter here. You can even delete them if you want, and it won't remove them from your post count.
>>6943 >>6944 Orrrrrrrr Do 20 meaningful, well though posts. Actually contribute to make CC less dead. And if you do I will give you posts.
Hey Gad, here's a suggestion: Could you add the autorefresh timer to the reports page? It would help to see what's "new" directly from the tab bar. That's all, picture unrelated.
>>6696 Oh ok, I thought it was something more trivial than that. Thanks man!
Wouldn't image hover be nice, i think so.
>>7439 what is image hover
Your spamfix is doing wonders gad. Definitely not seeing spam links all over the front page. No sir-ee. /s
>>6471 >If you remove the spam from the equation, necrobumping is not necessarily bad That's not the response I was getting while I necrobumped threads left and right intentionally on /b/ months ago trying to spur some activity. It worked to some degree but most of it was of retards bitching about it instead of making new threads that encouraged discussions about other things. >I'm not sure why he stopped deleting boards... That's because gadette is a lazy nigress my fellow chum. I personally don't understand the point of keeping them around either.
>>6474 Heh, people complain, I didn't mind the necrobumping. Just ignore the autistic screech or, like me... learn to actually enjoy it. Of course, if you learn to do you'll go to hell, like me.
What if... <tinfoilhat> Gad doesn't want to get rid of the spam because those sites are actually FBI monitored sites, and the permanent spam is the price Gad had to pay to keep himself out of jail when they took down Masterchan... </tinfoilhat>
>>6476 Doubt it. If you do a search on DDG of one of the spam links you'll find that there are several other sites/boards where there are no active posters that they spam on. Why is beyond me. Apparently on 32chan they're seeing spam on some boards identical to ours, mainly on /nofap/ which I find terribly amusing.
>>6479 I doubt it too, but it was such an outlandish theory I had to write it down. Also it would be really funny if true.
Hey Gad! Quick question, is there a motive why you left all those dead custom boards active? Wouldn't be better to wipe them? I just don't understand the motive behind your decision. Pic unrelated
candy really needs nuking
>>6385 Report illegal/spam posts and I'll delete them if I see them on the reports page chummers
>>6385 If board admins actually had power /candy/ would be looking a lot different
>>6391 That's because I would nuke the shit out of it.
>>6398 >I would nuke it We both know that's not gonna happen
I wish we had this much control over our own boards. It would even potentially help keep the spam down on the current ones owned by active/semi-active users.
>>6326 I think gadette should just wipe all the board accounts from people who haven't logged in in at least a year (which is still too lenient but I'm trying to be fair here) which would eliminate most of the dead boards probably. And cut down on the boards the spammer lays waste to all the time. ...and nuke /candy/ while we're on it.
>>6331 ...and TLC.
>>6333 I have it hidden, but that board too.
>>6335 That won't ever happen, sadly...
>>6319 >>6331 Candy was transferred to a new owner back when boards used to expire courtesy of gad ,so nuking candy probably won't ever happen
sooo ...hey.... when can we expect mass banning of IPs ?
>>7266 so what about curious.wtf ??
>>7267 looks like its gone rogue
>>7265 >the site is turning to shit. Newsflash boi: the site has been stillborn since its rebirth.
>>5664 Hopefully never. Isn't not getting banned kind of the point of this website?
Hey gadette, I know you're the almighty deity here and while most of us appreciate all that you have done here, have you thought about taking on an assistant to collaborate with for coding projects for improving this site while you're busy with whatever it is you do in RL? We rarely hear from you anymore about, well, anything really. And this site will never resume its former glory (in a different form of course) if progress made at a snail's pace.
>>6203 I think it's a matter of money mainly, the code of this chan is Gad's, perhaps adding another person would make his secret code vulnerable, paying another admin? Sure but that's a lot of money for something I'm sure is giving a net loss every month. Again, that's only my opinion.
>>6204 I never said anything about paying another person. It could be done on an entirely voluntary basis. Not everyone is motivated by money you know. Personally I'm surprised gadette hasn't added in a feature for donations. It might help in the motivation department to get things done in a more timely (and desired) manner.
>>6206 I get it what you say. Voluntary work is ... unreliable at best. Also, perhaps there's implications of accepting donations (the reputation of this chan doesn't help either), we didn't take in consideration, for example the obligation to have some sort of record of activity or a serious spam filter based in information Gad doesn't want to keep. I'm sure he considered the available alternatives already and this is the best we can have given the circumstances. Alas, I'm agree with you, it would be great more communication with Gad.
>>6206 >I'm surprised gadette hasn't added in a feature for donations. Stupid outlanders
>>6212 >outlanders Where?
are we under new ownership. ...dear mr gad, please explain recent and future changes
so who ever's in charge ... why not speak to us...or at least to me
>>7189 May be Gad doesn't have anything to say specifically to you. Get your attention elsewhere.
>>7189 Your question was already answered.
>can't get in to secret anymore :(
iv never been to sekrit, i didnt think it was real
the secret is a lie , just like the cake
>>4652 See /global/ It's really simple.
>>7087 he got in ages ago and then someone told him to fuck off
Bring back >Outlanders
>>6362 Other chains other rules, just open one account, spammed do it thousands times a day w it hour problems, so you shouldn't have one either.
>>6365 >being triggered enough to report a troll post t. Zerolevel