It's okay if you want to censor posts Gadmin - it's your site - but at least be open about it in the official rules. I'm especially thinking about the fairly innocent post regarding ISIS, Satanism, and plain just being edgy, which wasn't even remotely illegal. If you don't want that, then state/clarify that in the rules. I'd say that we've both learned something from my stress test.
>>7501 Gadmin, you forgot to add the Report Verified marks for these now reinstated posts, so that what you're saying now, would sound even remotely credible. Nobody reported these posts. You just removed them because you fell for a another troll posing as an authority, and paniced.
Also, since you complied with the takedown requests from the other troll, this brings up the issue that random users can just pose as authorities whenever they want, and have you dance for them. All they need to do is post as Outlander on the site. You don't seem to verify their IPs, you don't have an official way for authorities to contact you - I can just claim to be the head of Gestapo, and you'll remove whatever posts I claim to be illegal: "Remove this donut! It displeases Uganda!"
Pic related is whom you complied with, Gadmin. That's how see-through that identification was. Furthermore, "The Internet Watch Foundation is a registered charity based in Cambridgeshire, England", so you're complying with CHARITIES now, who has only legal jurisdiction in Britain, if you can even call it a jurisdiction at all! These guys are just moralfaggot bullies! ...and so since "innocent until proven guilty" still applies, I can in turn bully these bullies all over the internet, because they're too CORRUPT and TOOTHLESS to even DARE bring anything I do to them up in a court of law, because then they have to answer for things like seeding those Mary Beth pictures THEMSELVES. I would DESTROY them! ...and that's why I'm innocent.
>>7502 When someone makes a bunch of false reports, rather than verify each individually, I simply check dismiss all user reports. This makes all reported threads go back to unreported status, so if there was something that actually needed deletion in one of his reports, someone else can then report it again. If dismissing all reports caused the "verified" icon to appear, it would be untrue since I did not actually verify them. Please contain your rage and accusations before you actually listen to the other's person side of the story
>>7506 I'm sorry. I had no idea.
>Your anonymous ID must have been active for at least 2 days and have at least 25 posts before you can post on general boards. New users must first post at /newchums/. Please click here to be redirected to the new users board. https://ccluster.com/newchums Ya might want to update that to enrive.org from ccluster.com
>>7480 >I'll probably make so anyone can make a secret board Dood.. that would be so fucking sweet
>>7480 >takes the traffic from us.. Wouldn't want another dead chan out there lmao
>>7483 imagine having something saved on your laptop called micro_penis.webm. Good for you anon.
>>7485 >cy+5 >still having a laptop pleb
>>7459 not okay. Fuck accounts why the fuck is the catalog still disabledfuck this site. >>7459 why the fuck does view more new posted not duckling work fuck this fucking site.
Feature request: image spoilers
>>7494 >boo hoo >>>/4chan/ What do you think thos board is for chum?
>>7496 Oh, we have a suggestion board? I'm retarded, so while I've read the word "Suggestion" a few times, it didn't quite register in my brain.
>>7497 wew lad
Daily reminder that you're retarded Gad. >Fix the css nigger
Hey Gad! Quick question, is there a motive why you left all those dead custom boards active? Wouldn't be better to wipe them? I just don't understand the motive behind your decision. Pic unrelated
>>6385 If board admins actually had power /candy/ would be looking a lot different
>>6391 That's because I would nuke the shit out of it.
>>6398 >I would nuke it We both know that's not gonna happen
<a href=https://megaremont.pro/kazan-elektromontazhnye-raboty>Услуги электрика в Казани</a>
>>7490 cool spam bro
I have to request it, but I think it's time to disable outlanders from posting pictures, or.at least restrict them to only posting pictures on the newchums board and exclude those pictures from the front page. Everytime I stop by I'm reporting a whole page full of CP.. kinda voids the purpose of bringing outlanders back when thats the first thing they see when they visit enrive.. Just don't do away with outlander posting completely chum..
I'm just gonna leave the stuff on the reports screen for you to see.. (((Someone))) really wants this place to stay a dead chan... Prob the FBI, again. > https://thenextweb.com/security/2016/11/11/the-fbi-likely-ran-nearly-half-the-child-porn-sites-on-the-dark-web-in-2016/
Are you seeing the 100's of CP posts on the reports screen a day, or is another Gmod deleting it b4 you login? I quit moderating until you disable >Outlander posting of images..
I thought the IPs of the spammers were gonna get banned as well as banning the IPs of various proxy lists? I there even anything being done to the spammer or are they just free to spam as much as they want without getting banned?
>>7456 >banning the IPs of various proxy lists? For that you need a proxy list, and those cost money
>>7456 Everyday many IP's get permab& for CP.. It would take decades for the spammer to go thru all of them.
Hey Gad, can we make banners for our own boards?
>>7446 Let me rephrase that.. Can you add the feature so we can upload banners to our own boards?
>>7446 >>7447 Right now I'm 100% focused on revamping the source code, but in the future I'll address this. I don't think we'll ever have banners like on typical chans, but perhaps as a header next to the board name (which is pretty small right now and could use more emphasis)
How about image spoilers? I miss getting pissed off on having to click them just to see a fucking banana.
Image spoilers when? I personally hate them, but its still a fun feature when trolling. I think it would be wonderful for all new users with less then 100 posts to have there image spoiled automaticly, with an option to unspoil all thumbnails. That way when we get flooded with CP spam, it will be just a bunch of spoilered thumbnails until moderation. For users like me that hate spoilers and won't click them, I will just check the box that unspoiles all thumbnails. Everybody wins. execpt spammer
What happened to Outlanders?
>>6707 They all died in the great war, didn't you read the memo?
>>6584 when it was the pedos board of masterchan it was epic the memes the raids the class. chummery will never be the same. normies fuk everything up.
>>7400 Dubs=Truth Even tho the Normie's won the war
>>7402 sad times.indeed
I mentioned that imgchili links weren't spam itt: https://ccluster.com/b/thread/228328 I searched google for "Tanya mix site:ccluster.com" To see if those posts still existed or if they were deleted.. I clicked on the first google result >pic related
>>7353 Everything looks the same asides from the address bar saying dangerous instead of secure, and the reply box/link is missing. Also the report/delete box is missing... Almost reminds me of what Ccluster looks like when you click on a link from somewhere else, and get caught in the curious.wtf loop
>>7354 That was it, curious.wtf I clicked on the first pic and a new tab opened. I got the same screen though, with the warning about ooep.co But it says curious.wtf in the address bar..
>>7355 when I click on viewsource scroll down to the bottom I see a link to ooep.co When I shut off ad block plus and reload page Click on an image, I get brought to another tab It says its dangerous too, after clicking visit this unsafe site It finally brings me to a linkbucks screen Then after clicking on 'skip this ad' I finally get the image I clicked on. So it's working as designed and ooep.co is something to do with the linkbucks thing and google has decided that ooep.co a dangerous
>>7350 tl;dr: This whole thread is pointless I forgot to copy and paste links from google into the address bar Got caught in the curious.wtf loop The red dangerous screen is because google has blacklisted ooep.co Which is a linkbucks domain At first I thought something was wrong with ccluster, there isn't lol
>>7357 All is not lost here Gad, you need to change up the way curious.wtf works As having a ooep.co link in the code will cause chrome/chromium to block it. Then again, if "Protect you and your device from dangerous sites" was disabled, I wouldn't of got that screen.
Hey cock smooch, r9k filter when? The spammer is literally copy/paste, The same fucking post dozens of times in a row. Either pull the plug or give a fuck nig nog..
>>7323 Report helps, but I guess it's easier to whine about it, eh?
>>7324 Spam filters help too when they're utilized
>>7329 They are tons of them, it takes about 12 hours to circumvent them. In the end of the day it's one guy that apparently has no life and all he does is spam (I'm presuming this and other sites). People posts things and just ignore the spam, I do what I can while I'm on line which is not 24/7 so spam happens. AFAIK there's one other guy reporting, he's a big help and I can tell when he's on or not, if the other 3 would help too it would be almost impossible for the spammer to trash the site, but again... it's easier to whine about it.
>>7330 I could report the spam but since Gad decided to ignore this place, I don't see the point anymore. This place is just another dead chan now
>>7341 >I could report the spam but Yeah, whine is easier.
Can't you guys change the captcha to the cuckchani one? The cripplechani-like captcha is tedious and annoying.
>>7441 google catpcha spies on people, so no Create an anonymous ID and once you have a few posts with it you no longer need to type the captcha
>install sypware goyim YOU HAVE TO GO BACK
Why don't you respond to anybody anymore?
>>6633 you ... do... not... watch the show... ...fagot
>>7229 Replying to a 4 month old post TOP KEK
>>7230 If you're topkeking for that... you need help chum... Real fast
B r i n g B a c k O u t l a n d e r s N i g g e r
The reports page automatically purges posts to Gads report page after 24 hours.
>>7078 I think it's every 48. Let's do a test, report this post of mine and let's see.
>>7079 Cue to Gad trolling everyone with inconsistent purges
Gads not dead.
>>7121 Of course he's not. His species is inmortal.
>https://ccluster.com/?c&m&p&t&o&of=249&MasterChanUser=9gpsrriebe4hlr5e20rrigc477 >https://ccluster.com/media/thumbs/candy_35555.jpg Image exists but not the thread its from? >https://ccluster.com/candy/thread/35033#35555
Thanks for reporting my post i appreciate it ??????????????????????????????????????????????/
>>6961 It's still there, I guess Gad will restore it when he reviews the reports. I've no clue why it was reported, though.
>>6963 They thought they'd be smart and report it to get an answer but that never works out and it didn't either this time >>6960
>>6969 Probably a new guy, the regulars (all 5 of us) wouldn't do something that stupid. Although... if a regular want's to pretend to be a noob that would be a good way to do it.
Can you do something about false reports? Since you disabled Gmods from seeing who is abusing the report feature recklessly, perhaps to censor users, the amount of false reports has skyrocketed. Always dismissed too. I'm pretty sure its the same user that always gets called out, but only you know for sure.
>>6830 >volunteer btw
20 posts really is a lot when it's this dead. Wish I had my old account..
>>6943 post your account name, and Ill donate you 20 posts. Or goto /test/ and make 20 one letter/number posts, they can even be the same, no filter here. You can even delete them if you want, and it won't remove them from your post count.
>>6943 >>6944 Orrrrrrrr Do 20 meaningful, well though posts. Actually contribute to make CC less dead. And if you do I will give you posts.
sooo ...hey.... when can we expect mass banning of IPs ?
>>7266 so what about curious.wtf ??
>>7267 looks like its gone rogue
>>7265 >the site is turning to shit. Newsflash boi: the site has been stillborn since its rebirth.
>>5664 Hopefully never. Isn't not getting banned kind of the point of this website?
are we under new ownership. ...dear mr gad, please explain recent and future changes
so who ever's in charge ... why not speak to us...or at least to me
>>7189 May be Gad doesn't have anything to say specifically to you. Get your attention elsewhere.
>>7189 Your question was already answered.
>can't get in to secret anymore :(
iv never been to sekrit, i didnt think it was real
the secret is a lie , just like the cake
>>4652 See /global/ It's really simple.
>>7087 he got in ages ago and then someone told him to fuck off