I might take Enrive down temporarily, for some months to a year if interest in it remains this low. Since 2016, there were enough lurkers that the server costs were paying for itself with ads. So even if posting was low or we had no activity, I lost nothing by keeping us online. But at this moment, there are very few people browsing the site compared to what it used to be during 2014-2017 and ads only pay for 1/3 of the costs. It has gotten expensive to continue keeping us up when we have almost no posters, and when I have become so busy with my other business that I don't think I'll be able to code Enrive for a while. While I'll miss this place, there is no justification to keep it online if people are not interested in it, and it would be a better strategy to take it offline and only bring it back online in the future when I have finished coding it, or have more spare time and money to invest in it. If you like Enrive and want to support it and would prefer to keep it online, then help make the site grow at least a little. Doubling our Online Users to an 80 average should be enough that at least it is not a monetary burden on me any longer. I know that at least one person seems to be banned from every forum out there and Enrive is his only outlet, but due to the costs I may not be able to keep us up just for 1 or 2 people posting. Not with the world in the current monetary crisis it is. If I take us offline I will do so in 2 to 3 months. Enough time to mature the idea and I don't think I want to expend more money than that when I have been doing so for a year now. And just to be clear, it's not about the money, it is about the money + little interest on the website. The money I can save for not hosting us for a year may be much better spend re-hosting us in the future when the site is fully developed and where I can also put the time to work further on it.
47 пользователей онлайн
Hi. My name is Samuelle. I am a pedophile hunter.
Sorry. Wrong room.
Are you ready for me? ...'cause it's time to play.
Let's see how fast you can run.
>>1687 oh shit run
Who else grew up reading this?
>>1603 >>1603 Didn't grow up reading it, but I know I've read a bit of it a while ago. Was kind of disappointed, really.
>>1606 The last time I read all of them was 10 years ago. Now, I read them all again. I think it could have turned out a lot better to say the least.
i grew up with these two, sorry
>>1603 Whether you personally enjoy it or not (and I enjoy it a lot) JTHM gets stunning marks by pretty much every standard, so on that basis, I would consider it a great comic.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3DWn2OPwvM I honestly feel like they edited the dialogue way too much to really qualify this as a proper adaptation of Alan Moore's fantastic story. What do you guys think?
it was okay. bat girl was a stupid bitch the whole time. couldn't stand it the only saving grace was the end the joke and them 2 laughing Kind of brought it together in an odd way. most of the time i was bored as hell they should have added a scene and shown the whole rape and really roughing her up, ya know? I wanted to see her bloody and crying and lose consciousness Overall it was just decent. not on i'd recommend. there were better ones
>>1598 Yeah, sure, let's put the shit Alan Moore said it never happened.
>>1599 it doesn't take a rocket scientist to know what happened it is 2016 and the SJW/PC culture has taken over. of course he wouldn't admit to such things as a fucking male. don't want to ruin his job. he's not a fucking dumbass like you